On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:45 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:29 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > >> I thought only 32- and 64-bit integers were allowed? > > > > I thought we agreed on any size for sequential type indices. See > > PR950. > > I codified the rules after we agreed on them. > > The bc format is currently more efficient due to this restriction. > Are going to lose that?
Ah, you're right, and it encodes in only 2 bits for the 4 combinations so I'll fix the documentation. Reid. > > -Chris >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
