Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc] Signedness patch for rs6000.h

2006-12-21 Thread Reid Spencer
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 11:49 -0400, Jim Laskey wrote: > It's a bit of a tango, but enclosed is the patch I'll check in. The > i386 and ppc patches are dependent because of the change > to LLVM_TARGET_INTRINSIC_LOWER. Below are additional changes to > rs6000.h (marked in red). > > > > > Index:

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc] Signedness patch for rs6000.h

2006-12-20 Thread Reid Spencer
Jim, Don't commit that! These patches are intertwined. After everything is reviewed, I'll submit the whole thing as one patch. If you commit this, it will break on i386. Reid. On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 17:43 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Dec 20, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > Atta

Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc] Signedness patch for rs6000.h

2006-12-20 Thread Chris Lattner
On Dec 20, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > Attached is a patch for the gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h file to remove > isSigned() calls. This is analgous to the last patch I sent but for > PPC > instead of X86. Same comments > apply. > > This patch has not been compiled or tested as I don'