On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:24 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Isn't this the first hunk of the patch I sent?
Apparently so, but for some reason it didn't apply when I used the patch
command with your patch. Could have been pilot error this end.
Reid.
>
> -Chris
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Reid
Isn't this the first hunk of the patch I sent?
-Chris
On May 6, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> In addition to Chris' patch, you also need this patch:
>
> svn diff gcc/Makefile.in
> Index: gcc/Makefile.in
> ===
> --- gcc/Mak
In addition to Chris' patch, you also need this patch:
svn diff gcc/Makefile.in
Index: gcc/Makefile.in
===
--- gcc/Makefile.in (revision 327)
+++ gcc/Makefile.in (working copy)
@@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@
# We use llvm-config to d
Here's the bitcode patch as an attachment, in case the mirror gets
flakey:
llvm-gcc.patch
Description: Binary data
___
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
