Isn't this the first hunk of the patch I sent? -Chris
On May 6, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > In addition to Chris' patch, you also need this patch: > > svn diff gcc/Makefile.in > Index: gcc/Makefile.in > =================================================================== > --- gcc/Makefile.in (revision 327) > +++ gcc/Makefile.in (working copy) > @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ > > # We use llvm-config to determine the libraries that we need to > link in our > # target, optimizations analyses and the bcwriter. > -LLVMCOMPONENTS := $(LLVMTARGETOBJ) scalaropts transformutils > analysis bcwriter ipo bcreader > +LLVMCOMPONENTS := $(LLVMTARGETOBJ) scalaropts transformutils > analysis bitwriter ipo bitreader > LLVMLIBFILES := $(shell $(LLVMBINPATH)/llvm-config --libfiles $ > (LLVMCOMPONENTS)) > LLVMLDFLAGS := $(shell $(LLVMBINPATH)/llvm-config --ldflags) > LIBS += $(LLVMLDFLAGS) > > This tells the makefile to link against bitreader/bitwriter instead of > the bytecode variants. You can probably make this one line change by > hand. > > Reid. > > On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 02:36 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Here's the bitcode patch as an attachment, in case the mirror gets >> flakey: >> >> _______________________________________________ >> llvm-commits mailing list >> llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits > > _______________________________________________ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
