[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] release/19.x: [lldb] Fix crash when adding members to an "incomplete" type (#102116) (PR #102895)

2024-08-12 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 approved this pull request. LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102895 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] release/19.x: [lldb] Fix some tests that fail with system libstdc++ (#106885) (PR #107938)

2024-09-16 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Michael137 wrote: If you cherry-pick `2bcab9ba7139cfa96c85433fa85b29c8a6d7008b` alongside it, then we should be fine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107938 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://list

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [clang] [sanitizer] add pseudofunction to indicate array-bounds check (PR #128977)

2025-03-05 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Michael137 wrote: Could you elaborate on how this will be used/the motivation for this? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128977 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] 59e812f - [lldb][test] Skip pointer to std::unordered_map formatter tests on older Clang versions

2025-07-06 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Author: Michael Buch Date: 2025-07-04T07:39:13+01:00 New Revision: 59e812f2eed8be9674efa42cdbfe4a9d1fb57052 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/59e812f2eed8be9674efa42cdbfe4a9d1fb57052 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/59e812f2eed8be9674efa42cdbfe4a9d1fb57052.diff

[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-07-22 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ // DWPFOO-NEXT: struct CustomType { // DWPFOO-NEXT: typedef unsigned int IntegerType; // DWPFOO-NEXT: typedef float FloatType; -// DWPFOO-NEXT: CustomType::IntegerType x; -// DWPFOO-NEXT: CustomType::FloatType y; +// DWPFOO-NEXT: IntegerTyp

[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-07-22 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ // to the incomplete type. Make sure that succeeds. Use the expression command // to make sure the resulting AST can be imported correctly. // CHECK: expr -- var -// CHECK: (A::X) $0 = 0 +// CHECK: (X) $0 = 0 Michael137 wrote: Would be nice n

[llvm-branch-commits] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-07-22 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149949 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-08-06 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Michael137 wrote: > > @mizvekov do you have a macOS machine handy to test this on? Or do you want > > me to try? > > I don't think there is anything macOS specific about this change. > > My main development machine is macOS, and I always struggled with testing > LLDB on it. > > But I finally

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-08-06 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Michael137 wrote: Clean build succeeded. These tests fail on macOS: ``` Unresolved Tests (3): lldb-api :: commands/expression/import-std-module/list/TestListFromStdModule.py lldb-api :: commands/expression/import-std-module/non-module-type-separati

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-08-06 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 approved this pull request. Thanks for ensuring we don't lose the scope in our typenames! LGTM https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149949 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https:

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-08-06 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Michael137 wrote: @mizvekov do you have a macOS machine handy to test this on? Or do you want me to try? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149949 ___ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cg

[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] [lldb] [PATCH 7/7] [clang] improve NestedNameSpecifier: LLDB changes (PR #149949)

2025-08-06 Thread Michael Buch via llvm-branch-commits
Michael137 wrote: Hmmm getting this error when building the patch series locally ``` Undefined symbols for architecture arm64: "clang::NestedNameSpecifierLoc::getTypeLoc() const", referenced from: clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous namespace)::RetainPtrCtorAdoptChecker::checkASTDecl(c