github-actions[bot] wrote:
@nikic (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
htt
https://github.com/RKSimon approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109635
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109125
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@owenca (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
ht
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106043
>From 3e512ba17d90d5ab5382bae61a3e5762d2e3f42a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:30:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Concepts] Fix the constraint equivalence checking
involving p
tru wrote:
@RKSimon fine and safe to backport?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109635
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
Is this safe enough to merge @nikic ? any risks?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109624
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
Hi, since we are wrapping up this next release we are very strict with the
fixes we pick at this point. Can you please respond to the following questions
to help me understand if this has to be included in the final release or not.
Is this PR a fix for a regression or a critical iss
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@MaskRay (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
h
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109324
>From bb606ca6bff4555ffc2d7bd81edfc85434937141 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:40:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++] Adjust the version of __cpp_lib_ranges in C++20 mode
This is
tru wrote:
Many CI failures here as well. Can you check @ldionne ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109324
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-comm
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109309
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-09-24T08:19:09+02:00
New Revision: 1720219a1dea5c9b99df6dd1fdfb9dc8e77054fd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1720219a1dea5c9b99df6dd1fdfb9dc8e77054fd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1720219a1dea5c9b99df6dd1fdfb9dc8e77054fd.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109309
>From 1720219a1dea5c9b99df6dd1fdfb9dc8e77054fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 23:06:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ELF] --icf: don't fold a section without relocation and a
section wi
tru wrote:
Rebasing since we have several CI failures.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109291
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109291
>From 57b439c546276719dfb63e172014aa172987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Mazurkiewicz
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:12:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libc++] Follow-up to "Poison Pills are Too Toxic"
* Update
tru wrote:
Hi, since we are wrapping up this next release we are very strict with the
fixes we pick at this point. Can you please respond to the following questions
to help me understand if this has to be included in the final release or not.
Is this PR a fix for a regression or a critical iss
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@heiher (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
ht
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109110
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: hev
Date: 2024-09-24T08:16:20+02:00
New Revision: 910dde5780f9e8f3a16612bd89b512b2594e9ab7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/910dde5780f9e8f3a16612bd89b512b2594e9ab7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/910dde5780f9e8f3a16612bd89b512b2594e9ab7.diff
LOG: [Loo
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@mstorsjo (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109110
>From 910dde5780f9e8f3a16612bd89b512b2594e9ab7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hev
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:19:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [LoongArch][sanitizer] Fix SC_ADDRERR_{RD,WR} missing in the
musl environment
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109076
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
Looks safe enough.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109110
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> @ChuanqiXu9 this looks safe enough to be picked. Does the PR look fine to you?
Yes, I'll try to approve it formally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109076
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.ll
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109077
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109091
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Andrew Ng
Date: 2024-09-24T08:15:17+02:00
New Revision: 22139b36d7a81cd2dc08e9499a915def4aefc64e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22139b36d7a81cd2dc08e9499a915def4aefc64e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22139b36d7a81cd2dc08e9499a915def4aefc64e.diff
LOG
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109091
>From 22139b36d7a81cd2dc08e9499a915def4aefc64e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ng
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:19:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Reland [llvm-ml] Fix RIP-relative addressing for ptr operands
(#108061)
tru wrote:
This looks safe - @ChuanqiXu9 can you approve if it looks alright to you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109077
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@tstellar (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
tru wrote:
@ChuanqiXu9 this looks safe enough to be picked. Does the PR look fine to you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109076
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109072
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109072
>From de7ee2e3ae893d61c0fa1a601e84ed538ec85e70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:07:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [bolt][tests] Skip tests that use perf when perf counters are
unavail
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108397
>From b91df284f019fd00c9d0ae64a6ce815872071d8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Princeton Ferro
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 07:18:53 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [DAGCombiner] cache negative result from
getMergeStoreCandidates()
https://github.com/arsenm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102599
>From 1fb6376c0eaa07d8115760a41a59ef1eb989c7db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 14:51:41 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] AMDGPU: Add noalias.addrspace metadata when autoupgrading
atomic
vitalybuka wrote:
> "Consider"?
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109621
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109621
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109618
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109618
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
> Do you remember why this was implied from the mapping configuration in the
> first place?
No.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109620
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
fmayer wrote:
Do you remember why this was implied from the mapping configuration in the
first place?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109620
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109617
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109617
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109619
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/fmayer approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109617
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mtrofin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109203
>From 4b6269df2546069716bf3c7cc566e7ef918a02c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:18:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ctx_prof] Automatically convert available external linkage
to
https://github.com/mtrofin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109203
>From 2f34ca7929fd4040831d1ae51fd65420d5d2b630 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:18:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ctx_prof] Automatically convert available external linkage
to
@@ -141,3 +142,47 @@ NVPTXRegisterInfo::getFrameLocalRegister(const
MachineFunction &MF) const {
static_cast(MF.getTarget());
return TM.is64Bit() ? NVPTX::VRFrameLocal64 : NVPTX::VRFrameLocal32;
}
+
+void NVPTXRegisterInfo::clearDebugRegisterMap() const {
+ debugRegis
@@ -141,3 +142,47 @@ NVPTXRegisterInfo::getFrameLocalRegister(const
MachineFunction &MF) const {
static_cast(MF.getTarget());
return TM.is64Bit() ? NVPTX::VRFrameLocal64 : NVPTX::VRFrameLocal32;
}
+
+void NVPTXRegisterInfo::clearDebugRegisterMap() const {
+ debugRegis
@@ -141,3 +142,47 @@ NVPTXRegisterInfo::getFrameLocalRegister(const
MachineFunction &MF) const {
static_cast(MF.getTarget());
return TM.is64Bit() ? NVPTX::VRFrameLocal64 : NVPTX::VRFrameLocal32;
}
+
+void NVPTXRegisterInfo::clearDebugRegisterMap() const {
+ debugRegis
arsenm wrote:
> Thanks. Can this be landed after #102462?
That was the plan
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109407
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-
https://github.com/rampitec approved this pull request.
Thanks. Can this be landed after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102462?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109407
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.
arsenm wrote:
> Is there a plan that OpenCL and HIP FE will produce noalias metadata to avoid
> the expansion?
That's #102462 (although I think it needs refinement to avoid setting it in the
std::atomic case)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109407
___
rampitec wrote:
> > Is it legal and defined behavior to target private memory with an atomic?
>
> In the IR it would have to be, and this is the expected behavior in OpenMP
> and C++. It's UB in OpenCL, and UB in CUDA/HIP for old style atomics, but
> defined for new std::atomic style cases
Is
https://github.com/tavianator approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108385
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Chao Chen
Date: 2024-09-23T09:03:53-05:00
New Revision: 20f5cd2516c1a0ef12d5f8a625b31b2448d5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20f5cd2516c1a0ef12d5f8a625b31b2448d5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20f5cd2516c1a0ef12d5f8a625b31b2448d5.diff
LOG
tupos wrote:
Hello,
I think there might be some problem with this PR. I updated to 19.1.0 today and
started to see crashes with this callstack on random files. So far I was not
able to create a minimal working repro to let it reproducibly crashing.
Strangely enought it does not always crash o
@@ -102,19 +103,22 @@ class MachineTraceMetrics : public MachineFunctionPass {
TargetSchedModel SchedModel;
public:
+ friend class MachineTraceMetricsWrapperPass;
friend class Ensemble;
friend class Trace;
class Ensemble;
- static char ID;
+ // For legacy pas
https://github.com/gbMattN updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108385
>From 4bde5de87155d131d320ce5db4c9bb69b42d487d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Nagy
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:36:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] [TySan] Fix struct access with different bases
---
compiler-rt/
@@ -102,19 +103,22 @@ class MachineTraceMetrics : public MachineFunctionPass {
TargetSchedModel SchedModel;
public:
+ friend class MachineTraceMetricsWrapperPass;
friend class Ensemble;
friend class Trace;
class Ensemble;
- static char ID;
+ // For legacy pas
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang)
Changes
Promoted KMOV* was encoded with CD8 incorrectly, see
https://godbolt.org/z/cax513hG1
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109635.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/X86/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang)
Changes
Promoted KMOV* was encoded with CD8 incorrectly, see
https://godbolt.org/z/cax513hG1
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109635.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Ta
https://github.com/phoebewang milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109635
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109635
Promoted KMOV* was encoded with CD8 incorrectly, see
https://godbolt.org/z/cax513hG1
>From b403d2a05b548f24b46bab4c4ae014c9949f3c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phoebe Wang
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:41:43
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 5bcc82d43388bb0daa122d5fe7ecda5eca27fc16
Requested by: @nikic
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109624.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopP
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109624
Backport 5bcc82d43388bb0daa122d5fe7ecda5eca27fc16
Requested by: @nikic
>From 9fbd83b1e5b61eb80ba8cef41726a62086ea0ac0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:57:46 +0200
Subject:
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109624
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
Flags "-hwasan-mapping-offset" and
"-hwasan-mapping-offset-dynamic" are mutually
exclusive, use the last one.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109621.diff
2 Files
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
Flags "-hwasan-mapping-offset" and
"-hwasan-mapping-offset-dynamic" are mutually
exclusive, use the last one.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109621.diff
2 Files Affect
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
Relationship between "-hwasan-mapping-offset",
"-hwasan-with-ifunc", and "-hwasan-with-tls" can
be to hard to understand.
Now we will have "-hwasan-mapping-offset",
presense of which will im
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
It should not be implied form mapping settings.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109620.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HW
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109618.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSani
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109617.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer.cpp
(+30-43)
``diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Vitaly Buka (vitalybuka)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109617.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer.cpp
(+30-43)
``diff
diff
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
>From e56dbd6a0625890fd9a3d6a62675e864ca94a8f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 22:06:55 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [flang] Lower omp.workshare to other omp constructs
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104748
>From df6bd4282f21590b9d086608cd2cc136b18d54df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:25:55 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Fix todo tests
---
flang/test/Transforms/OpenMP/
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109621
Flags "-hwasan-mapping-offset" and
"-hwasan-mapping-offset-dynamic" are mutually
exclusive, use the last one.
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-com
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109620
It should not be implied form mapping settings.
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109618
None
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109619
Relationship between "-hwasan-mapping-offset",
"-hwasan-with-ifunc", and "-hwasan-with-tls" can
be to hard to understand.
Now we will have "-hwasan-mapping-offset",
presense of which will imply fixed shadow.
https://github.com/vitalybuka created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109617
None
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
>From e56dbd6a0625890fd9a3d6a62675e864ca94a8f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 22:06:55 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [flang] Lower omp.workshare to other omp constructs
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104748
>From b710a580ab1732b3b41f0e3fb0684b45108d2c09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:04:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] clang-format
---
flang/include/flang/Tools/CLOpt
ivanradanov wrote:
I have added a comment explaining the limitation of not allowing CFG in
workshare for now and an appropriate TODO message for that.
Regarding documenting the current supported statements in workshare - this
specific commit will still result in the trivial omp.single lowering
85 matches
Mail list logo
