[lldb-dev] [8.0.0 Release] rc5 has been tagged

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r355909. This is identical to rc4 with the addition of r355743. Hopefully it is the final release candidate, so please give it a good testing. As usual, please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. I'l

Re: [lldb-dev] Needs help contributing to lldb-vscode.

Greg, what do you think? On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:50 AM Qianli Ma wrote: > Hi lldb community, > > I am currently working on a project related to lldb. I'd like to write a > DAP RPC server similars to lldb-vscode.cc >

Re: [lldb-dev] Status of DWARF64 in LLDB

On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:25:05 +0100, Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev wrote: > I think it is never needed in real world as long as one uses DWP and/or > -fdebug-types-section. Red Hat is using neither (for DWZ postprocessing) and > so I did hit this limit of unsupported DWARF64 in GNU utilities [attache

Re: [lldb-dev] Needs help contributing to lldb-vscode.

This seems reasonable to me. It's worth pointing out though that in regards to the last comment "IMO it's good to make this lldb-vscode more general so that it can be used by other debugger frontends besides vscode", despite the name lldb-vscode, there is actually nothing here that is specific to

Re: [lldb-dev] Status of DWARF64 in LLDB

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:43 PM Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:25:05 +0100, Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev wrote: > > I think it is never needed in real world as long as one uses DWP and/or > > -fdebug-types-section. Red Hat is using neither (for DWZ postprocessing) >