Hi Ryan!
I talked to Sean Callanan about this. We think the real fix is probably
tracking down why llvm/clang are thinking it is okay to assume we want to
use the ocaml bindings without actually saying we want to use them.
Anything we do on our end looks like it would be a hack to avoid a broken
Where do I find the script xcode is using?
-- Ryan Brown
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Todd Fiala wrote:
> Right:
>
> "Okay, this might be the llvm/clang build script that Xcode uses as an
> llvm/clang build step. That's going to need to be updated if it is using
> configure (for the reaso
Right:
"Okay, this might be the llvm/clang build script that Xcode uses as an
llvm/clang build step. That's going to need to be updated if it is using
configure (for the reasons I mentioned above)."
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Are the Xcode scripts using the llv
Are the Xcode scripts using the llvm configure build? If so they will need
to be changed to the CMake build sooner or later, because the configure
build is going away in the near future.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:18 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Ah.
>
> Okay, thi
Ah.
Okay, this might be the llvm/clang build script that Xcode uses as an
llvm/clang build step. That's going to need to be updated if it is using
configure (for the reasons I mentioned above).
So it sounds like some part of llvm or clang may be sniffing and finding
some part of ocaml, and decid
Does xcode use configure? I just push command-B.
It does look like I have ocaml installed on my system, but I'm not sure how
it go installed or why xcode is trying to use it.
-- Ryan Brown
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Todd Fiala wrote:
> We definitely should not be requiring ocaml :-)
>
> A
We definitely should not be requiring ocaml :-)
Are you using a configure-based build? If so, can you switch over to using
cmake and see if you see that same issue? We pretty much don't maintain
the configure build, and it is getting stripped from llvm and clang in the
next version of them after
