> From: Ilia K
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:20:13 +0300
> Cc: Ted Woodward , yllumin...@gmail.com,
> jan.kratoch...@redhat.com, LLDB
>
> You are probably got it but yes, -file-list-exec-source-files and -break-list
> commands are not implemented yet.
> I'll try to find the time to fix it.
You are probably got it but yes, -file-list-exec-source-files and
-break-list commands are not implemented yet. I'll try to find the time to
fix it.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > From: "Ted Woodward"
> > Cc:
> > Date: Mon, 31 J
> From: "Ted Woodward"
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:24:31 -0500
>
> The best thing to do is give us a list of commands that are failing, in a bug
> opened in Bugzilla at http://bugs.llvm.org .
The URL I provided (after several mistaken attempts ;-) included a
lits of the failing commands.
Hafiz
> Abid Qadeer via lldb-dev
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:04 AM
> To: Eli Zaretskii ; Zachary Turner ; Jan
> Kratochvil ; Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev d...@lists.llvm.org>
> Cc: yllumin...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Emacs LLDB support & the GDB/MI Interface
&g
>>> Last time I tried, it wasn't "reasonable" enough to start debugging
>> a
>>> program under Emacs. See this discussion for details:
>>>
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108512.html
>>>
>>> The failed commands it shows are the initial ones issued by Emacs
>>> when a de
On July 30, 2017 7:15:29 AM GMT+03:00, Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev
wrote:
> On July 30, 2017 7:05:52 AM GMT+03:00, Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev
> wrote:
> > On July 30, 2017 6:30:04 AM GMT+03:00, Zachary Turner
> > wrote:
> > > Are we talking about some kind of mi support other than lldb's
> > > e
On July 30, 2017 7:05:52 AM GMT+03:00, Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev
wrote:
> On July 30, 2017 6:30:04 AM GMT+03:00, Zachary Turner
> wrote:
> > Are we talking about some kind of mi support other than lldb's
> > existing MI
> > interface? Afaik it works reasonably well (for some definition of
> > r
On July 30, 2017 6:30:04 AM GMT+03:00, Zachary Turner
wrote:
> Are we talking about some kind of mi support other than lldb's
> existing MI
> interface? Afaik it works reasonably well (for some definition of
> reasonably well), and is even used for example in msvc on windows to
> support remote d
Are we talking about some kind of mi support other than lldb's existing MI
interface? Afaik it works reasonably well (for some definition of
reasonably well), and is even used for example in msvc on windows to
support remote debugging of non windows targets.
That said, most lldb developers are pai
> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:43:59 +0200
> Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> From: Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev
>
> MI protocol was designed to minimize the amount of data transferred between
> gdb/lldb and a front end. But this communication isn't anything expensive as
> the debugger always runs on t
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:59:03 +0200, ylluminate via lldb-dev wrote:
> And one thread seems to indicate that if if we could "convince LLDB
> developers to provide
> a decent implementation of the GDB/MI protocol,
That is an oxymoron.
MI protocol was designed to minimize the amount of data transfer
Developers here may or may not be aware that there's some serious interest from
Emacs users to have proper support for LLDB in Emacs.
There's been some pretty heated debate that included RMS, but the community has
pretty much told him what they think about his opinion and are willing to
accept
12 matches
Mail list logo
