The original lldb-mi implementation was to get Eclipse talking to lldb. Since then there have been other people working on it, and other clients, but lldb-mi is not a full implementation of the MI protocol.
The best thing to do is give us a list of commands that are failing, in a bug opened in Bugzilla at http://bugs.llvm.org . Ted -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > -----Original Message----- > From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Hafiz > Abid Qadeer via lldb-dev > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:04 AM > To: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>; Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com>; Jan > Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com>; Eli Zaretskii via lldb-dev <lldb- > d...@lists.llvm.org> > Cc: yllumin...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Emacs LLDB support & the GDB/MI Interface > > > >>> Last time I tried, it wasn't "reasonable" enough to start debugging > >> a > >>> program under Emacs. See this discussion for details: > >>> > >>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108512.html > >>> > >>> The failed commands it shows are the initial ones issued by Emacs > >>> when a debugging session starts. Without support of these commands > >> in > >>> lldb-mi there's no hope for any > >>> practical debugging using lldb. > >>> If llvm developers could implement those minimal commands, maybe > the > >>> rest would be easier. > > I will try to add those command when my time allows. If there are others that > are needed to make Emacs work then please let me know or better open a > bug. > > Thanks, > Abid > > -- > Hafiz Abid Qadeer > Mentor Embedded/CodeSourcery > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
