Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > +1 to James's take > > I'd prefer simplicity of implementation over perfection here. > > If we end up with two different bug n

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

On 04/21/2020 06:50 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@list

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

On 4/21/20 6:50 PM, Richard Smith wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

Custom prefixes are intended for autolinks to external systems -- I suspect it would not work properly (but have not tested) if you used it to refer back to github itself. E.g. putting reverse links in issues you refer to, or closing an issue when writing "closes CUSTOM-123" in a commit message. O

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

GitHub also supports custom prefixes for the issues. However, here is another limitation: the prefix must be at least 3 letters, so we cannot, for example, autolink PR1234 issues. Already asked whether this restriction could be lifted. On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:15 PM James Y Knight via llvm-dev w

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 17:00, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev < > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org > wrote: > > > > +1 to Jam

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

On 04/21/2020 03:36 PM, Richard Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:04, Philip Reames via cfe-dev > mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > +1 to James's take > > I'd prefer simplicity of implementation over perfection here. > > If we end up with two different bug n

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

On 03/16/2020 10:13 AM, Florian Hahn wrote: > Hi, > >> On Mar 16, 2020, at 14:43, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev >> mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> I've also implemented a notification system using GitHub actions that will >> make >> it possible to subscribe to individual issue tags, so

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

On 02/10/2020 07:40 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/30/2020 12:47 PM, David Major wrote: >> Would it make sense to wait until 10.0.0 is released, in order to keep all >> the blockers in one place? >> > > Yes, I think this makes sense, let's postpone until then. > Hi, 10.0.0-rc4 was just releas

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

On 01/30/2020 12:47 PM, David Major wrote: > Would it make sense to wait until 10.0.0 is released, in order to keep all > the blockers in one place? > Yes, I think this makes sense, let's postpone until then. -Tom > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 1:32 PM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev > mailto:llvm

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

I'm happy to test things out, as long as it's not too much of a time sink (I have a lot on my plate at the moment, so something that takes more than the odd few minutes here and there may not be feasible). On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song wrote: > On 2020-01-31, Tom Stellard via llvm-de

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

Good idea. Let me ask for this. On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:17 AM Fangrui Song via llvm-dev wrote: > > On 2020-01-30, Anton Korobeynikov via cfe-dev wrote: > >> Will you be able to start numbering in github at a number larger than the > >> largest bug in bugzilla? It would be annoying to have over

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

On 2020-01-31, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: On 01/31/2020 01:21 AM, James Henderson wrote: My only concern is the ability to get auto-subscribed onto issues for specific tools (i.e. the setup I currently have). If that can be resolved in a satisfactory manner, then I'm all for this (althou

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

On 01/31/2020 01:21 AM, James Henderson wrote: > My only concern is the ability to get auto-subscribed onto issues for > specific tools (i.e. the setup I currently have). If that can be resolved in > a satisfactory manner, then I'm all for this (although less than two weeks > seems like a rather

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

My only concern is the ability to get auto-subscribed onto issues for specific tools (i.e. the setup I currently have). If that can be resolved in a satisfactory manner, then I'm all for this (although less than two weeks seems like a rather ambitious time to switch over...). If it can't, then I'd

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

I tend to support this – after 10.0.0 seems like a proper timeline. And we already have some set of tags from bugzilla, so we could simply add them. On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:49 PM David Major via llvm-dev wrote: > > Would it make sense to wait until 10.0.0 is released, in order to keep all > t

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

> Will you be able to start numbering in github at a number larger than the > largest bug in bugzilla? It would be annoying to have overlapping bug > numbers. Bug numbers exist in code comments, list archives, etc., etc. If > someone reads 'clang bug #1234' somewhere it will be ambiguous, whi

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues

> Do we have a way for individuals to get individually automatically subscribed > on all the bugs created for a given tag? > Mailing-lists seem fairly rigid in terms of granularity with respect to tags. No, all notifications are essentially all-or-nothing thing. Github folks knows about this issue