Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

TL;DR :-) Git-submodules works fine for bisecting for read-only use. I have the repo to do that. https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-submodule With a simple hooks/post-checkout, It should help effective bisecting. https://github.com/chapuni/llvm-project-scripts/blob/master/hooks/post-che

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Chris Lattner via cfe-dev > wrote: > >> On May 31, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev >> wrote: >> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >> that movi

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 12:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > wrote: > > What do people think? Any issue not covered that we should? > > I'm in favour of the move. Git-svn just about works most of the time, > b

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

On 5/31/2016 4:46 PM, Mehdi Amini via cfe-dev wrote: > Apparently I wasn't very clear: llvm and clang (and the others projects) > would be simple decoupled, individual git repositories. You would be able to > check them out however you want and commit to them individually. > There would be an ext

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> -Original Message- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi > Amini via llvm-dev > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:38 PM > To: Bill Kelly > Cc: LLVM Dev; Clang Dev; LLDB Dev > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone? > > > > On May 31, 2016, at 2:01 PM,

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> -Original Message- > From: mehdi.am...@apple.com [mailto:mehdi.am...@apple.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:54 PM > To: Robinson, Paul > Cc: Bill Kelly; Clang Dev; LLDB Dev; llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone? > > > > On May 31, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Robin

[lldb-dev] June LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday!

We'll be at Tied House as usual, starting on Thursday the 2nd at 7pm! If you can, please help us plan and RSVP here: http://meetu.ps/2XyCml See everyone there! ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Robinson, Paul wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: mehdi.am...@apple.com [mailto:mehdi.am...@apple.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:54 PM >> To: Robinson, Paul >> Cc: Bill Kelly; Clang Dev; LLDB Dev; llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >> Subject: Re: [l

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Robinson, Paul wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi >> Amini via llvm-dev >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:38 PM >> To: Bill Kelly >> Cc: LLVM Dev; Clang Dev; LLDB Dev >> Subject:

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev > wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:43:02PM -0700, Matthias Braun wrote: >> >>> On May 31, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:30PM -0700, Matthias Braun wrote:

Re: [lldb-dev] Inquiry regarding AddOneMoreFrame function in UnWindLLDB

> On May 31, 2016, at 11:31 AM, jing...@apple.com wrote: > > >> On May 31, 2016, at 12:52 AM, Ravitheja Addepally via lldb-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> I posted this query a while ago, i still have no answers, I am >> currently working on Bug 27687 (PrintStackTraces), so the reason for

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:43:02PM -0700, Matthias Braun wrote: > > > On May 31, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:30PM -0700, Matthias Braun wrote: > >> To be more exact here: I usually do not checkout llvm svn at a higher > >> l

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev > wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:30PM -0700, Matthias Braun wrote: >> To be more exact here: I usually do not checkout llvm svn at a higher >> level because that forces me back to svn (which last time I used it did >> not

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

My company is using submodules for the better or worse. It's not a perfect solution but it can work when using a version of git recent enough and some tooling. The magic command to update everything to the current commit pointed by each submodule : git submodules update --init --recursive To get t

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm in favor of both going to git as the source of truth, and then > switching the hosting to github. > > Echoing everyone else, this unlocks a lot of good stuff that I won't > repeat, and most of it ca

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > Personally, I’m hugely in favor of moving llvm’s source hosting to github at > some point, despite the fact that I continue to dislike git as a tool and > consider monotonicly increasing version numbers to be hugely beneficial. For whatever it's worth, our proje

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 1:42 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: > >> >> On May 31, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:24:08PM -0400, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev wrote: >>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev >>> wrote:

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

+1 for git Best regards, Alexey Bataev > 31 мая 2016 г., в 22:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > написал(а): > > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solut

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev > wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:24:08PM -0400, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev >> wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN host

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

Strong +1 to move to an external hosted git sooner rather than later! 1) I personally had very good experiences with git submodules. They are certainly harder to get used to as you have to learn a bunch of extra magic on top of the already magical git: i.e. "git clone --recurse-submodules", then

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Bill Kelly via llvm-dev > wrote: > > Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> Personally, I’m hugely in favor of moving llvm’s source hosting to github at >> some point, despite the fact that I continue to dislike git as a tool and >> consider monotonicly increasing v

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > > On 31 May 2016 at 13:45, Mehdi Amini via lldb-dev > wrote: >> Apparently I wasn't very clear: llvm and clang (and the others projects) >> would be simple decoupled, individual git repositories. You would be able to >> check them out howe

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

On 31 May 2016 at 13:45, Mehdi Amini via lldb-dev wrote: > Apparently I wasn't very clear: llvm and clang (and the others projects) > would be simple decoupled, individual git repositories. You would be able to > check them out however you want and commit to them individually. > There would be a

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:45:30PM -0700, Matthias Braun wrote: > To be more exact here: I usually do not checkout llvm svn at a higher > level because that forces me back to svn (which last time I used it did > not have built-in support for bisection, not sure if that changed > recently). svn-bis

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > > On 31 May 2016 at 21:28, Mehdi Amini wrote: >> Ideally, I'd prefer the cross-repository to be handled with an extra layer, >> in a way similar as described in: >> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-submodules.htm >

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 21:24, Aaron Ballman wrote: >> Are we sure that github's svn integration works with common tools on >> Windows, like TortoiseSVN? > > That's a good question. Can you try them out and report back? From my very simple testing

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:24:08PM -0400, Aaron Ballman via cfe-dev wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > wrote: > > Folks, > > > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussi

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

On 31 May 2016 at 21:28, Mehdi Amini wrote: > Ideally, I'd prefer the cross-repository to be handled with an extra layer, > in a way similar as described in: > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-submodules.htm > (somehow conceptually similar to Android manifests XML files

Re: [lldb-dev] TODAY! Updating to CMake 3.4.3

Have you investigated the impact of the merge downstream to the Swift enabled LLDB in GitHub? It's staged, so we shouldn't do it immediately but it would be helpful to know what to expect. Kate Stone k8st...@apple.com  Xcode Low Level Tools > On May 31, 2016, at 12:

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev > wrote: > >> On May 31, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev >> wrote: >> There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils >> of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was >> that mov

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On 31 May 2016 at 21:24, Aaron Ballman wrote: > Are we sure that github's svn integration works with common tools on > Windows, like TortoiseSVN? That's a good question. Can you try them out and report back? cheers, --renato ___ lldb-dev mailing list l

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

Likewise, I'd definitely be in favor of doing so. It would be great to have the entire LLDB development community on GitHub instead of the current story. Kate Stone k8st...@apple.com  Xcode Low Level Tools > On May 31, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Chris Lattner via lldb-dev >

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many adv

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

I'm in favor of both going to git as the source of truth, and then switching the hosting to github. Echoing everyone else, this unlocks a lot of good stuff that I won't repeat, and most of it can be handled independently from the VCS move. The major blocker I see for the move is figuring out how

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

> On May 31, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > wrote: > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages.

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 31 May 2016 at 12:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > wrote: > > What do people think? Any issue not covered that we should? > > I'm in favour of the move. Git-svn just about works most of the time, > b

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

On 31 May 2016 at 12:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote: > What do people think? Any issue not covered that we should? I'm in favour of the move. Git-svn just about works most of the time, but I find it makes committing to release branches particularly painful. It also randomly corrupts its datab

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?

peanut gallery comments from a git hater (We use git for all source revision control) On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev wrote: > Folks, > > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussio

[lldb-dev] GitHub anyone?

Folks, There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us a lot of headac

Re: [lldb-dev] TODAY! Updating to CMake 3.4.3

One more thing I want to note on this thread. For anyone looking at the patches. I’ve intentionally tried to make them minimal. After the patches have landed and stayed on trunk without issue for a while I’ll start doing cleanup around all the CMake version checks. I’d like to not open the floo

Re: [lldb-dev] Inquiry regarding AddOneMoreFrame function in UnWindLLDB

> On May 31, 2016, at 12:52 AM, Ravitheja Addepally via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hello, > I posted this query a while ago, i still have no answers, I am > currently working on Bug 27687 (PrintStackTraces), so the reason for the > failure is the erroneous unwinding of the frames from the ze

[lldb-dev] TODAY! Updating to CMake 3.4.3

Just an FYI. Later today I’ll be updating the CMake minimum version to 3.4.3. In advance of the transition I’ve posted a bunch of patches: LLVM: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20822 Clang: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20823 Compiler-RT: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20824 LLDB: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20826 li

[lldb-dev] crashlog.py bug fixes and enhancements

(I’ve already filed a couple of Radars about this; rdar://24025436 and rdar://26090553, for those with Radar access.) The crashlog.py script that ships with LLDB/Xcode is broken. It has a few outright bugs, for which I have fixes, and it also relies on an external script that has undocumented

[lldb-dev] Fwd: Inquiry regarding AddOneMoreFrame function in UnWindLLDB

Hello, I posted this query a while ago, i still have no answers, I am currently working on Bug 27687 (PrintStackTraces), so the reason for the failure is the erroneous unwinding of the frames from the zeroth frame. The error is not detected in AddOneMoreFrame, since it only checks for 2 more