ki.stfu added a comment.
👍
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47410
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
ki.stfu requested changes to this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Hi.
LGTM. Just fix a few minor issues before committing.
Thank you for your contribution to LLDB project!
Comment at:
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb
ki.stfu accepted this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Would you like me to commit it?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31073
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org
ki.stfu requested changes to this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Thanks for catching this! Could you update this CL to let me commit it?
Comment at:
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-mi/control/TestMiExec.py:287-289
+
ki.stfu added inline comments.
Comment at:
lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-mi/control/TestMiExec.py:329
+# We need to get past these instructions with a step to reach call
to s_MyFunction.
+self.runCmd("-exec-step --thread 1")
ki.stfu accepted this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
👍
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37533
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb
ki.stfu requested changes to this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
@enlight , thanks for giving a chance to review it, and sorry that it took to
long from my side.
Most of these changes look good to me, especially removing of meaningless
temporal
ki.stfu added a comment.
lgtm
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24711
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
ki.stfu accepted this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I don't know the point of this patch (probably it's something special for
NetBSD? @emaste) but I'm okay with that.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29256
ki.stfu added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29256#660159, @krytarowski wrote:
> It's undefined (implementation defined) behavior.
>
> C++11 5.2.2/7:
>
>
> > Passing a potentially-evaluated argument of class type having a
> > non-trivial copy constructor, a non-trivial move contr
ki.stfu added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29256#662167, @krytarowski wrote:
> @ki.stfu do you still agree with this patch?
Please follow my comments and then we can go ahead.
Comment at: tools/lldb-mi/MIDriver.cpp:512
CMICmnThreadMgrStd::Instance().GetEr
ki.stfu accepted this revision.
ki.stfu added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
lgtm
Comment at: tools/lldb-mi/MICmdCmdGdbShow.cpp:350
lldb::SBDebugger &rDbgr = m_rLLDBDebugSessionInfo.GetDebugger();
- m_strValue =
lldb::SBDebugger::GetInternalVar
12 matches
Mail list logo