rocallahan wrote:
> In addition, I guess we would eventually want to also document more generally
> how to use rr with lldb (how to start the rr replay, how to connect lldb to
> it, etc.) such that end users are able to discover this feature. However, I
> guess before doing so, we would like t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-remote-linux-win`
running on `as-builder-10` while building `lldb` at step 16
"test-check-lldb-unit".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/197/builds/3361
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/rocallahan ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132783
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1,11 +1,32 @@
+set(disas_srcs "")
+
if("ARM" IN_LIST LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD)
- add_subdirectory(ARM)
+ set(disas_srcs ${disas_srcs}
rnk wrote:
Good idea, done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133539
___
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-03-30T15:56:14-07:00
New Revision: 2796e41ade306c3bf0f2e21311dff406bcf65652
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2796e41ade306c3bf0f2e21311dff406bcf65652
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2796e41ade306c3bf0f2e21311dff406bcf65652.d
Author: Reid Kleckner
Date: 2025-03-30T15:08:40-07:00
New Revision: 848faf49f793968ae6dee1577f507d4cc68b157e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/848faf49f793968ae6dee1577f507d4cc68b157e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/848faf49f793968ae6dee1577f507d4cc68b157e.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere)
Changes
Hoist UUID generation into the UUID class and add a trivial unit test. This
also changes the telemetry code to drop the double underscore if we failed to
generate a UUID and subsequently logs to the
vogelsgesang wrote:
> Yes, but actually I think this documentation can be in rr.
Agree, we should probably have the bulk of the documentation in the rr repo.
Not sure if we want to put it online right away, or if we wait to wait for
lldb-21 to go out the door first. (Not sure how accustomed rr
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133662
Hoist UUID generation into the UUID class and add a trivial unit test. This
also changes the telemetry code to drop the double underscore if we failed to
generate a UUID and subsequently logs to the Host i
https://github.com/rocallahan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132783
>From 9bf6c80782adc8b76e50880ea0a2eea897274c25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert O'Callahan
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 22:48:14 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Implement CLI support for reverse-continue
This i
https://github.com/ashgti created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133624
This converts a number of json::Value's into well defined types that are used
throughout lldb-dap and updates the 'launch' command to use the new well
defined types.
>From 3240fe49515e5f59c5b9ff9c02423b77504d8a
alexfh wrote:
I've found a new crash that's not fixed by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133343. Reducing...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132401
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
https://github.com/rnk updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133539
>From 1c16745d1779d91bcc0b34e1a82cc98e70def316 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reid Kleckner
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:37:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Combine disassembler gtest binaries for efficiency
Each o
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ class UUID {
DecodeUUIDBytesFromString(llvm::StringRef str,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl &uuid_bytes);
+ /// Generate a random UUID.
oontvoo wrote:
s/Generate/Generates ? (to be consistent with the other comments)
ht
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
Original PR: #130537
Reland after updating lldb too.
This changes the MemberPointerType representation to use a NestedNameSpecifier
instead of a Type to represent the base class.
Since the qualifiers are
https://github.com/yingopq edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132688
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/yingopq updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132688
>From 6b950401848296565f9aa988b6edceb5a1bbc2e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ying Huang
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 03:44:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB][MIPS] Fix signal SIGBUS number mismatch error on mips
targe
https://github.com/yingopq edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132688
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/yingopq updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132688
>From 1b1285a8a2e9e9d0218054183276556af890c96a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ying Huang
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 03:44:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB][MIPS] Fix signal SIGBUS number mismatch error on mips
targe
@@ -654,6 +672,10 @@ class CommandObjectProcessContinue : public
CommandObjectParsed {
}
}
+ if (m_options.m_base_direction.has_value()) {
+process->SetBaseDirection(*m_options.m_base_direction);
+ }
JDevlieghere wrote:
```sug
@@ -744,6 +744,10 @@ let Command = "process continue" in {
Arg<"BreakpointIDRange">, Desc<"Specify a breakpoint to continue to,
temporarily "
"ignoring other breakpoints. Can be specified more than once. "
"The continue action will be done synchronously if this o
https://github.com/rocallahan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132783
>From 0d8334833e62c2e89df13bb26d2ce723878d6638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert O'Callahan
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 22:48:14 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Implement CLI support for reverse-continue
This i
rnk wrote:
Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/rnk closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133539
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-remote-linux-ubuntu`
running on `as-builder-9` while building `lldb` at step 6 "cmake-configure".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/195/builds/6919
Here is the relevant piece of the
Author: Reid Kleckner
Date: 2025-03-30T15:14:48-07:00
New Revision: 92e591684576e7244d53722b04e840f28c3f03c3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/92e591684576e7244d53722b04e840f28c3f03c3
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/92e591684576e7244d53722b04e840f28c3f03c3.diff
Author: John Harrison
Date: 2025-03-30T16:42:49-07:00
New Revision: 5b6386dcbd68d3f7c1ce98dd7acdd4477d5724ad
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5b6386dcbd68d3f7c1ce98dd7acdd4477d5724ad
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5b6386dcbd68d3f7c1ce98dd7acdd4477d5724ad.diff
https://github.com/oontvoo approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133662
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
rocallahan wrote:
> or if we wait to wait for lldb-21 to go out the door first
I'll definitely wait for the next lldb release before updating the rr docs.
> Would be great I'd you could add a short bullet point there
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132783
_
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133662
>From 15e07ce18961e63c22510fa34c7baa5b5985dfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:10:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Hoist UUID generation into the UUID class
H
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133662
>From 15e07ce18961e63c22510fa34c7baa5b5985dfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:10:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Hoist UUID generation into the UUID class
H
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ class UUID {
DecodeUUIDBytesFromString(llvm::StringRef str,
llvm::SmallVectorImpl &uuid_bytes);
+ /// Generate a random UUID.
JDevlieghere wrote:
I updated the existing comments to be imperative and updated thi
@@ -744,6 +744,10 @@ let Command = "process continue" in {
Arg<"BreakpointIDRange">, Desc<"Specify a breakpoint to continue to,
temporarily "
"ignoring other breakpoints. Can be specified more than once. "
"The continue action will be done synchronously if this o
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133662
>From f0a4b9bc2f20a812f7f37e5f5a2417dbbb4d45e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:10:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Hoist UUID generation into the UUID class
Hoist
alexfh wrote:
> @alexfh should be fixed by #133613
Thank you! The crash is resolved. Do you still need a reduced test case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132401
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-win-x-armv7l`
running on `as-builder-1` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 9
"test-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/38/builds/2638
Here is the relevant piece of
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: John Harrison (ashgti)
Changes
Small tweak to the previous patch to make the enums in `lldb_dap::protocol`
typed to work with types like `llvm::DenseSet` found by ubsan.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133622.diff
mizvekov wrote:
> > @alexfh should be fixed by #133613
>
>
>
> Thank you! The crash is resolved. Do you still need a reduced test case?
No worries, the tests included in PR already reproduce it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132401
___
ashgti wrote:
I may need to split this up into a smaller set of patches. Let me know what you
think.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133624
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
aperez wrote:
> @aperez Thoughts on this? I think this could be useful
I think it could be useful as well.
Couple things to note though:
- If you allow for both sequences and iterators as arguments into
`lldb.Progress.track` you might not know the total number steps in advance.
- You'll need
40 matches
Mail list logo
