aperez wrote: > @aperez Thoughts on this? I think this could be useful
I think it could be useful as well. Couple things to note though: - If you allow for both sequences and iterators as arguments into `lldb.Progress.track` you might not know the total number steps in advance. - You'll need to handle the case when users exit the loop early, so that `Finalize()` is still called. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133527 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
