stigger added a comment.
Ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D20041
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
zturner added a subscriber: zturner.
zturner added a comment.
I like the approach taken here in general.
One thing that I wonder about, if we have the Triple, why do we even need the
PathSyntax at all? In light of the fact that not all Posix filesystems are
case sensitive, this calls into ques
stigger added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D20041#533725, @zturner wrote:
> How difficult would be it be to eliminate the `PathSyntax` enumeration
> entirely and update every user of `PathSyntax` to use a triple instead?
I've attempted to do it and hit two issues which I'm not sure h
For #2 you can use llvm::GetProcessTriple(), i will think about #1 when I
have a chance to look at the code
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 2:38 PM Vyacheslav Karpukhin <
vyaches...@karpukhin.com> wrote:
> stigger added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D20041#533725, @zturner wrote:
>
> > How dif
Author: tfiala
Date: Sat Sep 3 19:43:10 2016
New Revision: 280606
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280606&view=rev
Log:
XFAIL TestGdbRemoteExitCode failing tests
Tracked by:
llvm.org/pr30271
Modified:
lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/exit-code/TestGdb
