Author: dhinton
Date: Sat Feb 17 15:06:15 2018
New Revision: 325452
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=325452&view=rev
Log:
Add DEBUGSERVER_PATH to the cache so it'll be available for tests.
This fixed a problem caused by r325442.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43432
Author: dhinton
Date: Sat Feb 17 11:17:21 2018
New Revision: 325442
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=325442&view=rev
Log:
[cmake] Fix LLDB_CODESIGN_IDENTITY logic.
Summary:
Consolidate LLDB_CODESIGN_IDENTITY logic in one place and use
SKIP_DEBUGSERVER, which can be set independently,
Author: dhinton
Date: Tue Nov 14 10:19:41 2017
New Revision: 318164
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=318164&view=rev
Log:
Add check for self-assignment. NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39578
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Core/RegisterValue.cpp
lldb/trunk/s
Author: dhinton
Date: Fri Nov 3 07:59:36 2017
New Revision: 317327
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=317327&view=rev
Log:
Add type to FileSpec::PathSyntax enum.
Summary:
Add type to FileSpec::PathSyntax enum to decrease size for
FileSpec on systems with 32 bit pointers.
Thanks to @zt
Btw, is there a way to pass the '-m' option via the SB API? I'd like to
exclude matches in comments when using BreakpointCreateBySourceRegex.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Don Hinton wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Zachary Turner
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:12 AM
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:12 AM Don Hinton wrote:
>
>> There have been a few suggestions that I could just use a script to solve
>> this "problem" -- poor startup performance of clangdiag.
>>
>> However, this patch was not submitted to
There have been a few suggestions that I could just use a script to solve
this "problem" -- poor startup performance of clangdiag.
However, this patch was not submitted to solve a particular problem. It
was submitted in response to Jim's suggestion:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Jim Ingham w
I'll add tests if it looks like it'll be accepted, but based on the initial
response, that doesn't seem likely.
However, it was a good exercise and addressed the issues raised.
thanks again for all the feedback...
don
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Asking again, but w
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:18 PM Don Hinton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Zachary Turner
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems fine, it would be nice if the workflow could be improved a little
>>> bit so that all you have to do is say
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Seems fine, it would be nice if the workflow could be improved a little
> bit so that all you have to do is say `clangdiag break
> —error=“-Wcovered-switch”` or something . I think that gives the most
> intuitive usage for people, even it’s
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Greg Clayton via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> clayborg added a comment.
>
> Each lldb.SBValue has accessors for the stuff in an execution context:
>
> ``
>
> lldb::SBTarget GetTarget();
> lldb::SBProcess GetProcess();
> lldb::SBThread GetT
11 matches
Mail list logo