On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:12 AM Don Hinton <hinto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There have been a few suggestions that I could just use a script to solve
>> this "problem" -- poor startup performance of clangdiag.
>>
>> However, this patch was not submitted to solve a particular problem.  It
>> was submitted in response to Jim's suggestion:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, that would be easy to implement from the command line, maybe add a
>>> --file-is-regex flag or something.
>>>
>>> From the SB API it would be better to have something like:
>>>
>>> SBFileList SBTarget.GetFileListMatchingRegex("regex")
>>>
>>> Please file an enhancement request for these of hack'em in if you're so
>>> motivated.
>>>
>>
>> clangdiag was only provided as a motivating example.
>>
>
> Fair point, I had forgotten about that.  That said, I'm honestly still not
> that big of a fan.   It's no secret that I have a higher bar than others
> for options and API additions, but to me the potential use this particular
> option + SB API would get is not sufficient to justify the long term
> maintenance burden associated with having it.
>

I'm not that familiar with the SB API part, but will investigate, and try
to come up with a better motivation.

Thanks again for the suggestions and feedback...
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to