Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] arm64: topology: Support SMT control on ACPI based system

2025-03-04 Thread Pierre Gondois
On 3/3/25 15:40, Yicong Yang wrote: On 2025/3/3 19:16, Sudeep Holla wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:56:12AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: On 2/28/25 20:06, Sudeep Holla wrote: Ditto as previous patch, can get rid if it is default 1. On non-SMT platforms, not calling cpu_smt_set_num_thr

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Hello Maddy, Git bisect is poinitng to d543c29a68989ac9e39e0b50cfe8b592d92a1599 as the first bad commit. Git Bisect log: [root@ltc-zzci-1 linux-next]# git bisect log git bisect start # status: waiting for both good and bad commits # good: [7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6] Linux 6.14

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
t also be helpfull if you can provide a disassembly of the three file.o around the warned address. I could recreate the issue with gcc 11.4.1 20231218 with today's linux-next (but could not recreate with gcc 14 or gcc 11.3.0) (20d5c66e1810 (HEAD -> master, tag: next-20250304, origin/master,

[PATCH 1/2] tools/perf: Add field to annotation options to determine disassembler used

2025-03-04 Thread Athira Rajeev
When doing "perf annotate", perf tool provides option to use specific disassembler like llvm/objdump/capstone. The order picked is to use llvm first and if that fails fallback to objdump ie to use PERF_DISASM_LLVM, PERF_DISASM_CAPSTONE and PERF_DISASM_OBJDUMP In powerpc, when using "data type" sor

[PATCH 2/2] tools/perf/powerpc: Use return code from disasm_line__parse

2025-03-04 Thread Athira Rajeev
In disasm_line__parse_powerpc() , return code from function disasm_line__parse() is ignored. This will result in bad results if the disasm_line__parse fails to disasm the line. Use the return code to fix this. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev --- tools/perf/util/disasm.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3

Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] arm64: topology: Support SMT control on ACPI based system

2025-03-04 Thread Pierre Gondois
On 3/4/25 11:02, Sudeep Holla wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: On 3/3/25 15:40, Yicong Yang wrote: On 2025/3/3 19:16, Sudeep Holla wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:56:12AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: On 2/28/25 20:06, Sudeep Holla wrote: Ditto as

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Madhavan Srinivasan
: >>>> intra_function_call not a direct call >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Can you please specific the compiler and compiler version you found this >>> issue with >>> >> >> Can you also tell which defconfig you are using or pr

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
ned address. I could recreate the issue with gcc 11.4.1 20231218 with today's linux-next (but could not recreate with gcc 14 or gcc 11.3.0) (20d5c66e1810 (HEAD -> master, tag: next-20250304, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Add linux-next specific files for 20250304) warning for one of the swi

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Venkat Rao Bagalkote
t also be helpfull if you can provide a disassembly of the three file.o around the warned address. I could recreate the issue with gcc 11.4.1 20231218 with today's linux-next (but could not recreate with gcc 14 or gcc 11.3.0) (20d5c66e1810 (HEAD -> master, tag: next-20250304, origin

Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] arm64: support copy_mc_[user]_highpage()

2025-03-04 Thread Tong Tiangen
Hi,Catalin: Kindly ping ... Thanks.:) 在 2025/2/19 3:42, Catalin Marinas 写道: On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:51:10PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote: 在 2025/2/13 1:11, Catalin Marinas 写道: On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:42:56AM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote: Currently, many scenarios that can tolerate memory er

Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: dma: Convert fsl,elo*-dma to YAML

2025-03-04 Thread J . Neuschäfer
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 07:42:00AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:29:54AM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:57:17 +0100, J. Neuschäfer wrote: > > > The devicetree bindings for Freescale DMA engines have so far existed as > > > a text file. This

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
31218 with today's linux-next (but could not recreate with gcc 14 or gcc 11.3.0) (20d5c66e1810 (HEAD -> master, tag: next-20250304, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Add linux-next specific files for 20250304) warning for one of the switch.S file :    CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/syscal

Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/hugetlb: Disable gigantic hugepages if fadump is active

2025-03-04 Thread Sourabh Jain
Hello Ritesh, On 04/03/25 10:27, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote: Sourabh Jain writes: Hello Ritesh, Thanks for the review. On 02/03/25 12:05, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote: Sourabh Jain writes: The fadump kernel boots with limited memory solely to collect the kernel core dump. Having gigantic

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix 'intra_function_call not a direct call' warning

2025-03-04 Thread Sathvika Vasireddy
On 3/5/25 4:30 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: The following build warning have been reported: arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a d

[PATCH] crypto: powerpc: Mark ghashp8-ppc.o as an OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
The following build warning has been reported: arch/powerpc/crypto/ghashp8-ppc.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x22c: unannotated intra-function call This happens due to commit bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support for decoding all types of uncond branches") Disassembly of arch/powerpc/crypt

[PATCH] powerpc: Fix 'intra_function_call not a direct call' warning

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
The following build warning have been reported: arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a direct call This happens due to commit bb7f054f4

[PATCH] powerpc: Fix address calculation in clear_utlb_entry()

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
In relocatable.S, function clear_utlb_entry() goes into real mode. To do so, it has to calculate the physical address based on the virtual address. To get the virtual address it used 'bl' which is problematic (see commit XXX). In addition, the calculation is done on a bad address, which may lead to

Re: [PATCH] PCI/AER: Add kernel.aer_print_skip_mask to control aer log

2025-03-04 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc Jon, Karolina] On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:57:03PM +0800, Bijie Xu wrote: > Sometimes certain PCIE devices installed on some servers occasionally > produce large number of AER correctable error logs, which is quite > annoying. Add this sysctl parameter kernel.aer_print_skip_mask to > skip prin

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 04/03/2025 à 07:13, Madhavan Srinivasan a écrit : On 3/4/25 10:42 AM, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote: Greetings!! Observing build warnings with linux-next and powerpc repo's. Issue is currently not seen on mainline yet. PPC Repo: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https

[PATCH] AER: PCIE CTO recovery handle fix

2025-03-04 Thread 孙利斌_Dio
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] From 5fc7b1a9e0f0bcfa14068c6358019ed1e3ffc6c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "dio.sun" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:54:49 + Subject: [PATCH] AER: PCIE CTO recovery handle fix - Non-fatal PCIe CTO is reportted to PCIE RC and it will be convertted to AdvNonFatalErr automatica

Re: Build Warnings at arch/powerpc/

2025-03-04 Thread Madhavan Srinivasan
nnotated intra-function call >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: >>> intra_function_call not a direct call >>> >>> >> >> Can you please specific the compiler and compiler version you found this >> issue with >> &g

Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] arm64: topology: Support SMT control on ACPI based system

2025-03-04 Thread Sudeep Holla
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: > > > On 3/3/25 15:40, Yicong Yang wrote: > > On 2025/3/3 19:16, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:56:12AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: > > > > On 2/28/25 20:06, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ditto

Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] arch_topology: Support SMT control for OF based system

2025-03-04 Thread Dietmar Eggemann
On 03/03/2025 15:03, Yicong Yang wrote: > On 2025/2/28 19:11, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> On 18/02/2025 15:10, Yicong Yang wrote: >>> From: Yicong Yang [...] >>> If a system have more than one SMT thread number the 2) may >> >> s/have/has >> >>> not handle it well, since there're multiple thread

Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsl_audmix: support audio graph card for audmix

2025-03-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:05:04 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > Change 'dais' property to be optional, that fsl_audmix device can be > linked with SAI device by audio graph card. > > Shengjiu Wang (4): > ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,sai: Document audio graph port > ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,audmix: Document

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix 'intra_function_call not a direct call' warning

2025-03-04 Thread Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Hello Christophe, On 05/03/25 4:30 am, Christophe Leroy wrote: The following build warning have been reported: arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_f

Re: [PATCH] crypto: powerpc: Mark ghashp8-ppc.o as an OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD

2025-03-04 Thread Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Hello Christophe, On 05/03/25 4:32 am, Christophe Leroy wrote: The following build warning has been reported: arch/powerpc/crypto/ghashp8-ppc.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x22c: unannotated intra-function call This happens due to commit bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support for decodin