On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 14:38, Vasant Hegde
wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-dump.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-dump.c
> b/arch/powerpc
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:28:59AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I don't love it, a new C file and an out-of-line call to then call back
> to a static inline that for most configuration will return false ... but
> whatever :)
Yeah, hch thinks it'll cause a big mess otherwise:
https://lore.kern
On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 01:27 +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> The general convention for pcibios_* hooks is that they're named after
> the corresponding pci_* function they provide a hook for. The exception
> is pcibios_add_device() which provides a hook for pci_device_add(). This
> has been irrita
Commit b1442c55ce8977aa ("serial: 8250: extend compile-test coverage")
added compile-test support to the Freescale 16550 driver. However, as
SERIAL_8250_FSL is an invisible symbol, merely enabling COMPILE_TEST now
enables this driver.
Fix this by making SERIAL_8250_FSL visible. Tighten the depen
While investigating a lockup at startup on Powerbook 3400C, it was
identified that the fbdev driver generates alignment exception at
startup:
--- interrupt: 600 at memset+0x60/0xc0
NIP: c0021414 LR: c03fc49c CTR: 7fff
REGS: ca021c10 TRAP: 0600 Tainted: GW
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the answer.
>> From: Roman Skakun
>>
>> It is possible when default IO TLB size is not
>> enough to fit a long buffers as described here [1].
>>
>> This patch makes a way to set this parameter
>> using cmdline instead of recompiling a kernel.
>>
>> [1] https://www.xilinx.com/s
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> But the question remains: Why does the framebuffer need to be mapped
> in a single giant chunk?
More importantly: if you use dynamic dma mappings for your framebuffer
you're doing something wrong.
At interrupt exit, kuap_kernel_restore() calls kuap_unclok() with the
value contained in regs->kuap. However, when regs->kuap contains
0x it means that KUAP was not unlocked so calling
kuap_unlock() is unrelevant and results in jeopardising the contents
of kernel space segment registers.
S
dcbz instruction shouldn't be used on non-cached memory. Using
it on non-cached memory can result in alignment exception and
implies a heavy handling.
Instead of silentely emulating the instruction and resulting in high
performance degradation, warn whenever an alignment exception is
taken due to
On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 03:19, Ricardo Neri
wrote:
>
> When deciding to pull tasks in ASYM_PACKING, it is necessary not only to
> check for the idle state of the destination CPU, dst_cpu, but also of
> its SMT siblings.
>
> If dst_cpu is idle but its SMT siblings are busy, performance suffers
> if
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:31PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This patch series provides a generic helper function, cc_platform_has(),
> to replace the sme_active(), sev_active(), sev_es_active() and
> mem_encrypt_active() functions.
>
> It is expected that as new confidential computing technolo
Le 15/09/2021 à 12:08, Borislav Petkov a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:28:59AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
I don't love it, a new C file and an out-of-line call to then call back
to a static inline that for most configuration will return false ... but
whatever :)
Yeah, hch thinks it
On 9/15/21 9:46 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Sathya,
if you want to prepare the Intel variant intel_cc_platform_has() ontop
of those and send it to me, that would be good because then I can
integrate it all in one branch which can be used to base future work
ontop.
I have a Intel variant patc
On 15.09.2021 15:37, Roman Skakun wrote:
>>> From: Roman Skakun
>>>
>>> It is possible when default IO TLB size is not
>>> enough to fit a long buffers as described here [1].
>>>
>>> This patch makes a way to set this parameter
>>> using cmdline instead of recompiling a kernel.
>>>
>>> [1] https:/
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:18:34PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Could you please provide more explicit explanation why inlining such an
> helper is considered as bad practice and messy ?
Tom already told you to look at the previous threads. Let's read them
together. This one, for example:
htt
On Sat Sep 11, 2021 at 3:26 AM CDT, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:35 PM Christopher M. Riedl
> wrote:
> >
> > x86 supports the notion of a temporary mm which restricts access to
> > temporary PTEs to a single CPU. A temporary mm is useful for situations
> > where a CPU needs to
On Sat Sep 11, 2021 at 4:14 AM CDT, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Christopher M. Riedl
> wrote:
> >
> > When code patching a STRICT_KERNEL_RWX kernel the page containing the
> > address to be patched is temporarily mapped as writeable. Currently, a
> > per-cpu vmalloc pat
On Tue Sep 14, 2021 at 11:24 PM CDT, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Christopher M. Riedl
> wrote:
> > ...
> > +/*
> > + * This can be called for kernel text or a module.
> > + */
> > +static int map_patch_mm(const void *addr, struct patch_mapping
> > *patch_mapping)
> >
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:38 AM Christopher M. Riedl
wrote:
>
> On Sat Sep 11, 2021 at 4:14 AM CDT, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Christopher M. Riedl
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When code patching a STRICT_KERNEL_RWX kernel the page containing the
> > > address to be patc
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM Christopher M. Riedl
wrote:
>
> On Tue Sep 14, 2021 at 11:24 PM CDT, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Christopher M. Riedl
> > wrote:
> > > ...
> > > +/*
> > > + * This can be called for kernel text or a module.
> > > + */
> > > +static in
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:05 PM Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:02 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> >
> > Commit 59438b46471a ("security,lockdown,selinux: implement SELinux
> > lockdown") added an implementation of the locked_down LSM hook to
> > SELinux, with the aim to restrict whic
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:59 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:05 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:02 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Commit 59438b46471a ("security,lockdown,selinux: implement SELinux
> > > lockdown") added an implementation of th
22 matches
Mail list logo
