Added support to allow an 85xx kernel to be run from a non-zero physical
address (useful for cooperative asymmetric multiprocessing situations) and
kdump. The support can either be at compile time or runtime
(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE).
Currently we are limited to running at a physical address that is m
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for reviewing it.
> > Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-pnp.c
> > ===
On Friday 28 March 2008, Mark Lord wrote:
> Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> >> hdparm explicitely marks HDIO_[UNREGISTER,SCAN]_HWIF ioctls as DANGEROUS
> >> and given the number of bugs we can assume that there are no real users:
> ..
>
> There is the odd user of
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:47:04PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Compatible names should refer to a specific version of the hardware,
> without wildcards. Change each instance of mv64x60 to mv64360, which
> is the oldest version we currently support.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 04:49:00PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote:
> From: Mark A. Greer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Remove several unused (or software config only) properties.
> Rename marvel node to "soc". Technically, it's not an SOC,
> but its organization is the same as an SOC. Also, rename the
>
Hi Kumar,
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:34:49 -0500 (CDT) Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The alignment compile check broke building on ppc32 (pmac, etc) since
> CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN isn't defined there.
OK, so that explains why linux-next failed to build for 32 bit powerpc
yesterday. In the
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 16:37 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> This patch fixes several section mismatch warnings in the
> ibm_newemac driver similar to:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.devinit.text+0x3a04): Section mismatch in reference from
> the function emac_probe() to the function .devexit.text:tah_detach(
