On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 12:05:17 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We have a big list of selects under CONFIG_PPC, and currently they're
> completely unsorted. This means people tend to add new selects at the
> bottom of the list, and so two commits which both add a new select will
> often conflict.
>
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:05:17 +1100 Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
>>
>> We have a big list of selects under CONFIG_PPC, and currently they're
>> completely unsorted. This means people tend to add new selects at the
>> bottom of the list, and so two commits which both add a
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:05:17 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> We have a big list of selects under CONFIG_PPC, and currently they're
> completely unsorted. This means people tend to add new selects at the
> bottom of the list, and so two commits which both add a new select will
> ofte
We have a big list of selects under CONFIG_PPC, and currently they're
completely unsorted. This means people tend to add new selects at the
bottom of the list, and so two commits which both add a new select will
often conflict.
Instead sort it alphabetically. This is nicer in and of itself, but al
