On Fri, 2015-17-07 at 10:46:58 UTC, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
> uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
> is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
> and thus may not be used by interrupt
- Original Message -
> The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
> uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
> is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
> and thus may not be used by interrupts handlers like the EPOW h
On 22/07/15 13:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-17-07 at 10:46:58 UTC, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
>> uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
>> is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might
On Fri, 2015-17-07 at 10:46:58 UTC, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
> uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
> is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
> and thus may not be used by interrupt
On 07/17/2015 05:46 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
> uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
> is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
> and thus may not be used by interrupts handlers l
The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
and thus may not be used by interrupts handlers like the EPOW handler!
This leads to the following B
