On 22/07/15 13:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-17-07 at 10:46:58 UTC, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The EPOW interrupt handler uses rtas_get_sensor(), which in turn
>> uses rtas_busy_delay() to wait for RTAS becoming ready in case it
>> is necessary. But rtas_busy_delay() is annotated with might_sleep()
>> and thus may not be used by interrupts handlers like the EPOW handler!
>> This leads to the following BUG when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is
>> enabled:
>
> When did we break this?
Hi Michael,
the bug has been introduced by commit 587f83e8dd50d22bc0c62e32ec49fd31
("powerpc/pseries: Use rtas_get_sensor in RAS code") which switched the
EPOW handler to use rtas_get_sensor() instead of using rtas_call directly.
Also have a look at this thread here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-ppc/msg10768.html
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
