Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 04:19 +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > I fail to see the point of this "special" partition in the first > place... > > Things would make more sense if you had a full flash device > whose child nodes are the partitions. That's the model I think I want to move to, and

Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-29 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:05 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all > the > partitions. Like in: > > partit...@ff00 { > reg = < 0x00 0x80 >; > label = "Root File System"; > }; > partit...@ff80

Re: [PATCH] [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name v3

2009-04-28 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the partitions. Like in: partit...@ff00 { reg = < 0x00 0x80 >; label = "Root File System"; }; partit...@ff80 { reg = < 0x80 0x1a >; label = "Bitstream"; }; ... f...@f

Re: [PATCH] [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name v3

2009-04-27 Thread Benjamin Krill
>--- a/drivers/mtd/ofpart.c >+++ b/drivers/mtd/ofpart.c >@@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ int __devinit of_mtd_parse_partitions(struct device *dev, > > /* check if this is a partition node */ > partname = of_get_property(pp, "name", &len); >- if (strcmp(partname, "partiti

[PATCH] [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name v3

2009-04-24 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the partitions. Like in: partit...@ff00 { reg = < 0x00 0x80 >; label = "Root File System"; }; partit...@ff80 { reg = < 0x80 0x1a >; label = "Bitstream"; }; ... f...@ff00

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hello Scott It is definitively more elegant... Let me send tomorrow a patch On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 20:11, Scott Wood wrote: > Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >> >> Hi Scott >> >>> Perhaps "compatible" should be used instead? >> >> What do you mean? >> >> if (strcmp(partname, "partition") || s

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Benjamin Krill
* Ricardo Ribalda Delgado | 2009-04-22 19:59:08 [+0200]: >> >>                if (strcmp(partname, "partition") <= 0) { > >Anything alfabetically higher than partition (like "z" will pass >the test :S) You are totally right! cheers ben ___ Linuxppc

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Scott Wood
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: Hi Scott Perhaps "compatible" should be used instead? What do you mean? if (strcmp(partname, "partition") || strcmp(partname, "compatible") ) I can't see the advantages. No, I mean: foo { compatible = "partition"; ... }; -Scott

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hello Benjamin > Hi Recardo, > > I would suggest to do: > >                if (strcmp(partname, "partition") <= 0) { Anything alfabetically higher than partition (like "z" will pass the test :S) Regards > > cheers >  ben > > -- Ricardo Ribalda http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hi Scott > Perhaps "compatible" should be used instead? What do you mean? if (strcmp(partname, "partition") || strcmp(partname, "compatible") ) I can't see the advantages. > >> Hi Recardo, >> >> I would suggest to do: >> >>                if (strcmp(partname, "partition") <= 0) { > > Check wh

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Scott Wood
Benjamin Krill wrote: --- a/drivers/mtd/ofpart.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ofpart.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int __devinit of_mtd_parse_partitions(struct device *dev, /* check if this is a partition node */ partname = of_get_property(pp, "name", &len); - if (strcmp

Re: ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Benjamin Krill
>--- a/drivers/mtd/ofpart.c >+++ b/drivers/mtd/ofpart.c >@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int __devinit of_mtd_parse_partitions(struct device *dev, > > /* check if this is a partition node */ > partname = of_get_property(pp, "name", &len); >- if (strcmp(partname, "partiti

Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Hello You are right, remove the -1. I thought that strlen gives the #of chars + 1 ('\0'). Thanks On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> "Ricardo" == Ricardo Ribalda Delgado writes: > > Hi, > >  Ricardo> Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device >  Ric

ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the partitions. Like in: partit...@ff00 { reg = < 0x00 0x80 >; label = "Root File System"; }; partit...@ff80 { reg = < 0x80 0x1a >; label = "Bitstream"; }; ... partition

Re: [MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Ricardo" == Ricardo Ribalda Delgado writes: Hi, Ricardo> Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device Ricardo> tree including all the partitions. Like in: Ricardo> drivers/mtd/ofpart.c |3 ++- Ricardo> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Ricardo> diff

[MTD] ofpart: Partitions at same address cannot have the same name

2009-04-22 Thread Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Sometimes, an special partition is included in the device tree including all the partitions. Like in: partit...@ff00 { reg = < 0x00 0x80 >; label = "Root File System"; }; partit...@ff80 { reg = < 0x80 0x1a >; label = "Bitstream"; }; ... parti