On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 15:49 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:36 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > -next and -merge are now both to the same level, which is the same
>
> I think you meant -master (not -merge).
Yup, typo, sorry
Hi Ben,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:36 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> -next and -merge are now both to the same level, which is the same
I think you meant -master (not -merge).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:34 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> It contains 3 branches:
>
> - merge : this is for merging with the current stable and doesn't
> currently contain anything interesting
>
> - master : this is our current "powerpc.git" tree, it may contain
>
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 09:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> If you want to use your master branch as a place for experimental
> stuff, that's fine by me. But you'll want to keep next separate from
> it so it's as "clean" as possible for those trying to track what is
> definitely going into the next
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:30:58PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
> > on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and we drop
> > it you'll do a git-revert of it?
>
> I'll try as much as possible.
> What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
> on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and we drop
> it you'll do a git-revert of it?
I'll try as much as possible. But I'll keep the option open. "next" is
the one that should never be rebased I'd s
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 03:23:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:20:08 -0600 Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was under the impression that there was some consensus that -next
> > branches should be used for unstable experiments. Am I mistak
Hi Kumar,
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:47:45 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did, GregKH start up a tree for code not quite ready ( -staging).
Greg's staging tree is for whole drivers etc not in the kernel yet that
need work to get there.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:47:45 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:20 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:08:32AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Kumar,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 9 Jul 20
Hi Grant,
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:20:08 -0600 Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that there was some consensus that -next
> branches should be used for unstable experiments. Am I mistaken?
Completely. Anything that will end up in linux-next must be posted,
revi
On Jul 9, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:20 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:08:32AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Kumar,
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:58:38 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
What is your intent with the 'master' bra
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:20 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:08:32AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Kumar,
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:58:38 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:08:32AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Kumar,
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:58:38 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
> > on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and
Kumar,
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:58:38 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
> on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and we drop
> it you'll do a git-revert of it?
"Ever" is such a strong word. E
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:40:21AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:34:41 +1000
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, Paul is pretty good about not rebasing his branches when at all
>> possible, and I susp
On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:34:41 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've pushed some updates to my version of powerpc.git.
The tree itself is at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git
It contains 3 bra
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:34:41 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've pushed some updates to my version of powerpc.git.
>
> The tree itself is at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git
>
> It contains 3 branches:
>
> - merge : this is fo
On Jul 9, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I've pushed some updates to my version of powerpc.git.
The tree itself is at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git
It contains 3 branches:
- merge : this is for merging with the current stable and doesn't
I've pushed some updates to my version of powerpc.git.
The tree itself is at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git
It contains 3 branches:
- merge : this is for merging with the current stable and doesn't
currently contain anything interesting
- m
19 matches
Mail list logo
