Kumar, On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:58:38 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan > on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and we drop > it you'll do a git-revert of it?
"Ever" is such a strong word. Even Paul on occasion rebased his master branch. I see no reason why Ben could not run his master (or maybe better named "test") branch as a place that patches come and go and his "next" branch as something that never (or very rarely) gets rebased with commits progressing from master (test) to next when he is satisfied with them. People should then base further work in the "next" branch. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpuQJckDgihf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
