On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:55:50 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:35 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >
> > From what I've seen, setup_cpu is never called for BOOKE.
> > Currently It's called from cputable.c for PPC64 and from head_32.S for
> > 6
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:35 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>
> From what I've seen, setup_cpu is never called for BOOKE.
> Currently It's called from cputable.c for PPC64 and from head_32.S for
> 6xx.
> Thanks,
Right. We need to fix/converge some of these but it's not totally
trivial.
Ben.
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:29 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:25:06 -0500
>> Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:56:32PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
I was thinking about it. Looks like it's the best pl
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:29 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:25:06 -0500
> Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:56:32PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > >
> > > I was thinking about it. Looks like it's the best place, but the code
> > > t
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:32:56 -0500 (CDT)
> Milton Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri Sep 21 02:56:32 EST 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>>> Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:24 -0500
Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:32:56 -0500 (CDT)
Milton Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri Sep 21 02:56:32 EST 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:24 -0500
> >> Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Stefan Roese
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:25:06PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:56:32PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking about it. Looks like it's the best place, but the code that
> > actually calls setup_cpu is under ifdef CONFIG_PPC64, while lots of
> > cpu_s
On Fri Sep 21 02:56:32 EST 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:24 -0500
>> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Valentine,
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:25:06 -0500
Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:56:32PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >
> > I was thinking about it. Looks like it's the best place, but the code that
> > actually calls setup_cpu is under ifdef CONFIG_PPC64, while lots
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:56:32PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>
> I was thinking about it. Looks like it's the best place, but the code that
> actually calls setup_cpu is under ifdef CONFIG_PPC64, while lots of
> cpu_setup functions are defined for ppc32 processors.
> Is it OK to remove this
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:24 -0500
> Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>> Hi Valentine,
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
Disabling write pipelining really helps.
>>>
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:24 -0500
Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > Hi Valentine,
> >
> > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > > Disabling write pipelining really helps.
> > > Josh, David, what is
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:47PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Valentine,
>
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > Disabling write pipelining really helps.
> > Josh, David, what is the right place to put this workaround to?
> >
> > Is it OK to do mtdcr(PLB4A0_ACR, mfdcr
Hi Valentine,
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Disabling write pipelining really helps.
> Josh, David, what is the right place to put this workaround to?
>
> Is it OK to do mtdcr(PLB4A0_ACR, mfdcr(PLB4A0_ACR) & ~PLB4_WRP); in
> arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-sequoia.c:sequoia_f
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:39:05 +0400
Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've observed kernel crashes on Sequoia board several times.
> Kernel often crashes with high network/memory loads.
> This is due to 440EPx h/w issue.
>
> According to the errata:
> CHIP_8: Incorrect Write to DDR SD
15 matches
Mail list logo