On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:25:06 -0500 Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:56:32PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote: > > > > I was thinking about it. Looks like it's the best place, but the code that > > actually calls setup_cpu is under ifdef CONFIG_PPC64, while lots of > > cpu_setup functions are defined for ppc32 processors. > > Is it OK to remove this ifdef, or should I do CONFIG_PPC64 || CONFIG_44x? > > Sounds like something that went wrong at the merge of ppc and ppc64. > > Take out the ifdef, even if there's fallout we should deal with it > instead of adding more complex ifdefs. Yeah. Looks like BenH did this in commit: 42c4aaadb737e0e672b3fb86b2c41ff59f0fb8bc Ben, any reason you ifdef'd it for ppc64? josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
