On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 19:50, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:21:29PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >
> > > As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.
> >
> > tests/truncated_property.c:45: warning: 'err' is used uninitialized
> > in
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:26:27 +1000 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:35:46PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> >
> > We could also ship a generated .S file (dtc -O asm -o ps3-dt.S
> > ps3.dts), which would be easier to maintain in the source tree than a
> > binary f
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:52:07AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>
> > We decided that since a formal dtc release was imminent, it would be
> > simpler to make dtc a new kernel build requirement, rather than
> > integrate the substantial blob of dtc code into the kernel tree
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:35:46PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > David Gibson writes:
> >
> >> We decided that since a formal dtc release was imminent, it would be
> >> simpler to make dtc a new kernel build requirement, rather than
> >> integrate the substantial blob of d
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:21:29PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> > As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.
>
> tests/truncated_property.c:45: warning: 'err' is used uninitialized
> in this function
Looks good. If you had a Signed-off-by, I'd add
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>
>> We decided that since a formal dtc release was imminent, it would be
>> simpler to make dtc a new kernel build requirement, rather than
>> integrate the substantial blob of dtc code into the kernel tree and
>> then have to deal with the maintenance
David Gibson writes:
> We decided that since a formal dtc release was imminent, it would be
> simpler to make dtc a new kernel build requirement, rather than
> integrate the substantial blob of dtc code into the kernel tree and
> then have to deal with the maintenance / synchronization issues
> be
>>> We decided that since a formal dtc release was imminent, it would be
>>> simpler to make dtc a new kernel build requirement,
>>
>> For _all_ kernel builds? Most people building a powerpc
>> kernel don't need it.
>
> The dtc is run from the wrapper script, so if you build for a platform
> that
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Actually, after discussions with Stephen and Paulus, we decided not
to
take this route. In any case having Kbuild like versioning wouldn't
actually help us any in integrating into a full Kbuild system.
>>>
>>> Can you elaborate why you decided not to?
On Thu, Aug 09, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.
tests/truncated_property.c:45: warning: 'err' is used uninitialized in this
function
(untested patch)
---
tests/truncated_property.c |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/test
>>> Actually, after discussions with Stephen and Paulus, we decided not
>>> to
>>> take this route. In any case having Kbuild like versioning wouldn't
>>> actually help us any in integrating into a full Kbuild system.
>>
>> Can you elaborate why you decided not to? I'm just curious.
>
> We decid
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 11:25 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:01:33PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Well, I tagged and released an official DTC v1.0.0 Release
> > and pushed it out to jdl.com just now. You can grab the
> > git repo directly:
> >
> > g
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:37:54PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:30:01 +1000
> David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Except didn't you say you were going to work with Stephen to get DTC
> > > into the kernel source itself? Keeping things similar to Kbuild might
> > >
David Gibson wrote:
>> Except didn't you say you were going to work with Stephen to get DTC
>> into the kernel source itself? Keeping things similar to Kbuild might
>> help in that effort.
>
> Actually, after discussions with Stephen and Paulus, we decided not to
> take this route.
Could you pl
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:30:01 +1000
David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Except didn't you say you were going to work with Stephen to get DTC
> > into the kernel source itself? Keeping things similar to Kbuild might
> > help in that effort.
>
> Actually, after discussions with Stephen and
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:48:13AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:33:31 +1000
> David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:21:33AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > > So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > >
> > > > > > Only thing I'm not r
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:01:33PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Well, I tagged and released an official DTC v1.0.0 Release
> and pushed it out to jdl.com just now. You can grab the
> git repo directly:
>
> git://www.jdl.com/software/dtc.git
>
> or download a tarball here:
>
>
>>> Ok, figured out why. When I push, then pop a quilt patch some of the
>>> files end up with their original contents, but changed timestamps.
>>> That altered stat information causes git-diff-index to give false
>>> indications of changed files, so setlocalversion adds the -dirty.
>>> Running gi
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:33:31 +1000
David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:21:33AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> >
> > > > > Only thing I'm not really happy with in the current release is the
> > > > > versioning stuff.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:35:03AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
> > To that end, I've published a repo on jdl.com with a v1.0.0-rc1
> > tag on it. I anticipate some updates to the Docum
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
> To that end, I've published a repo on jdl.com with a v1.0.0-rc1
> tag on it. I anticipate some updates to the Documentation before
> a final 1.0.0 release still. However, if you have so
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:11:57PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Ok, figured out why. When I push, then pop a quilt patch some of the
> > files end up with their original contents, but changed timestamps.
> > That altered stat information causes git-diff-index to give false
> > indications
> Ok, figured out why. When I push, then pop a quilt patch some of the
> files end up with their original contents, but changed timestamps.
> That altered stat information causes git-diff-index to give false
> indications of changed files, so setlocalversion adds the -dirty.
> Running git status,
> I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
> To that end, I've published a repo on jdl.com with a v1.0.0-rc1
> tag on it. I anticipate some updates to the Documentation before
> a final 1.0.0 release still. However, if you have something
> you would like to have be in The Real
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:33:31AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:21:33AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
[snip]
> > I hve also verified that at least one other independent build
> > using this approach produces a correct version string for them
> > as well.
>
> Yes, well, this
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:21:33AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
>
> > > > Only thing I'm not really happy with in the current release is the
> > > > versioning stuff. For starters, it always reports my builds as
> > > > -dirty, even when they're not.
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > > Only thing I'm not really happy with in the current release is the
> > > versioning stuff. For starters, it always reports my builds as
> > > -dirty, even when they're not.
> >
> > I think it won't do that once there is a tag available.
>
> Yo
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:04:30AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:12:00AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
> >
> > It would certainly be great
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:12:00AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
>
> It would certainly be great to have a release, since dtc is becoming
> necessary for more and more kern
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:05:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:12:00AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
> > To that end, I've published a repo on jdl.com with a v1.0.0-rc1
> > tag on it. I antici
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:12:00AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to make an official DTC Version 1.0.0 release soon!
> To that end, I've published a repo on jdl.com with a v1.0.0-rc1
> tag on it. I anticipate some updates to the Documentation before
> a final 1.0.0 release stil
31 matches
Mail list logo
