On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:35:46PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > David Gibson writes:
> >
> >> We decided that since a formal dtc release was imminent, it would be
> >> simpler to make dtc a new kernel build requirement, rather than
> >> integrate the substantial blob of dtc code into the kernel tree and
> >> then have to deal with the maintenance / synchronization issues
> >> between the in-kernel and upstream versions.
> >
> > Um, what I thought we decided was to ship a pre-built .dtb for ps3
> > (once its dts settles down), and make dtc a kernel build requirement
> > only for embedded platforms.
>
> We could also ship a generated .S file (dtc -O asm -o ps3-dt.S ps3.dts),
> which would be easier to maintain in the source tree than a binary file,
> then use something like this in the wrapper script:
>
> ${CROSS}gcc -c -o ${platform}-dt.o ${platform}-dt.S
> ${CROSS}objcopy -O binary ${platform}-dt.o ${platform}.dtb
>
> Untested, but it seems like it would work.
Yes, I'm aware of that option and am considering it.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
