On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 21:59 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> More generally, the target interrupt descriptors (sense values, in
> >> particular) in a device tree interrupt map describe the interrupts as
> >> seen on the target interrupt controller, *not* as seen on this
> >> (source)
> >> in
>> More generally, the target interrupt descriptors (sense values, in
>> particular) in a device tree interrupt map describe the interrupts as
>> seen on the target interrupt controller, *not* as seen on this
>> (source)
>> interrupt domain. This should be obvious, but since the source
>> interru
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 21:39 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> Using '8' is correct. PCI interrupts are *always* level sensitive and
> >> active
> >> low.
> >
> > Unless you use one of those strange bridges that stick not gates on the
> > PCI IRQ inputs :-) But I don't think that's the case on
>> Using '8' is correct. PCI interrupts are *always* level sensitive and
>> active
>> low.
>
> Unless you use one of those strange bridges that stick not gates on the
> PCI IRQ inputs :-) But I don't think that's the case on the 440EP.
More generally, the target interrupt descriptors (sense values
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 07:15 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> Using '8' is correct. PCI interrupts are *always* level sensitive and
> active
> low.
Unless you use one of those strange bridges that stick not gates on the
PCI IRQ inputs :-) But I don't think that's the case on the 440EP.
Ben.
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:37 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I plugged in an old 3Com ethernet card tonight. Slot 0. It was
> assigned dev #4 IRQ 25. Using the device tree as-is, I could see
> interrupts happening in /proc/interrupts but ethernet traffic failed.
>
> Then I changed the sense level to
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Is anybody using Bamboo PCI support right now? Does it actually work?
>
> I plugged in an old 3Com ethernet card tonight. Slot 0. It was
> assigned dev #4 IRQ 25. Using the device tree as-is, I could see
> interrupts happening in /proc/interrupts b
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:02:33 -0600
Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having two problems with PCI interrupts as described in bamboo.dts.
> Here is are the properties in question:
>
> /* Bamboo has all 4 IRQ pins tied together per slot */
> interrupt-map-mask = ;
>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:07:50AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> Uh.. there's no binding written down, it's just encoded into uic.c.
> >>> But UIC doesn't use OpenPIC sensitivity encoding. Like FSL's IPIC,
> >>> it
> >>> uses Linux IRQ_TYPE values from include/linux/irq.h which makes 8
>
>>> Uh.. there's no binding written down, it's just encoded into uic.c.
>>> But UIC doesn't use OpenPIC sensitivity encoding. Like FSL's IPIC,
>>> it
>>> uses Linux IRQ_TYPE values from include/linux/irq.h which makes 8
>>> "level sensitive, active-low".
>>
>> On a related note: aren't we taking
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:42:47PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:59 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > Uh.. there's no binding written down, it's just encoded into uic.c.
> > But UIC doesn't use OpenPIC sensitivity encoding. Like FSL's IPIC, it
> > uses Linux
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:59 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>
> Uh.. there's no binding written down, it's just encoded into uic.c.
> But UIC doesn't use OpenPIC sensitivity encoding. Like FSL's IPIC, it
> uses Linux IRQ_TYPE values from include/linux/irq.h which makes 8
> "level sensitive, active-lo
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:02:33PM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> I'm having two problems with PCI interrupts as described in bamboo.dts.
> Here is are the properties in question:
>
> /* Bamboo has all 4 IRQ pins tied together per slot */
> interrupt-map-mask = ;
> interrupt-ma
13 matches
Mail list logo
