On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:07:50AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> Uh.. there's no binding written down, it's just encoded into uic.c.
> >>> But UIC doesn't use OpenPIC sensitivity encoding. Like FSL's IPIC,
> >>> it
> >>> uses Linux IRQ_TYPE values from include/linux/irq.h which makes 8
> >>> "level sensitive, active-low".
> >>
> >> On a related note: aren't we taking a risk here of seeing those values
> >> change in linux ?
> >
> > We've discussed this before. If that happens, the binding must remain
> > on the old values. It means the driver will then need a translation
> > which it doesn't now, but we can deal with it.
>
> It also means it should be written down in the binding _already_.
Well, yes, there should be, but isn't, a written binding for this,
amongst many other things.
> Come on, how much work is that?
Greater than zero.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
