On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> This time around, the powerpc merges are going to be a little bit
> more complicated than usual.
Looks like I sent this one twice, one with "merge" and one with "next"
in the subject. They are otherwise identical (i
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 15:05 +0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > My original intend was to put it in powerpc-next and then shoot it to
> > stable, but it got a tad annoying (due to churn it needs to be applied
> > at least on rc4
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> My original intend was to put it in powerpc-next and then shoot it to
> stable, but it got a tad annoying (due to churn it needs to be applied
> at least on rc4 or later while my next is at rc1 and clean that way), so
> I put it i
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:58 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are a handful of powerpc fixes for 3.13.
>
> Grr.
>
> I've pulled it, but looking at that history, it's just pure and utter
> f*cking garbage.
>
> It was rebas
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Here are a handful of powerpc fixes for 3.13.
Grr.
I've pulled it, but looking at that history, it's just pure and utter
f*cking garbage.
It was rebased *minutes* before sending it, as far as I can tell. Why?
And it has a pointl
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>
> So, we now use the original date header (if present) in the mbox views:
>
> $ wget -qO - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/249598/mbox/ | grep ^Date
> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:54 +1000
>
> ... for all your data-mining needs.
Goodie, and I
Hi Linus,
> No. The date from the email was
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:54 +1000
>
> and we want *that* date.
Ah, gotchya.
So, we now use the original date header (if present) in the mbox views:
$ wget -qO - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/249598/mbox/ | grep ^Date
Date: Fri, 7 Jun
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> .. the rationale for this is that the work pattern of people is
> actually interesting information. You can do things like this:
>
> git log --pretty=%aD --author=Torvalds
Final side note: for me, and other git users that apply other p
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> And it does matter.
.. the rationale for this is that the work pattern of people is
actually interesting information. You can do things like this:
git log --pretty=%aD --author=Torvalds
to see what my work pattern is, and I think tha
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>
> We keep all patch dates in UTC, but were generating the Date header
> incorrectly. Now fixed:
No, not fixed.
Keeping patch dates in UTC *corrupts* the date.
I'll ask people to stop using patchworks if it cannot keep track of
emailed dates.
Hi Linus,
> Is Jeremy the patchwork maintainer?
Yep, that's me.
> and it turns out that apparently 'patchwork' is just making up random
> times, because when you download the email as an mbox, it will turn
> this into that corrupt and incorrect
>
> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:42:54 -
>
>
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 14:33 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are a few more powerpc changes for 3.10. I've merged your
> > tree in at some point (which I generally avoid) in order to get
> > the compat network fixes as soo
[ Is Jeremy the patchwork maintainer? If not, can people forward this
to the real maintainer? ]
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> This is not just bugfixes. In fact, as far as I can tell, this
> *introduces* bugs, with that "get_user()" in the exception path that
> can app
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Here are a few more powerpc changes for 3.10. I've merged your
> tree in at some point (which I generally avoid) in order to get
> the compat network fixes as soon as possible.
>
> Mostly regressions, and stuff I judged could/shoul
On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 09:22 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here are a few more fixes for powerpc 3.10. It's a bit more than I would
> have liked this late in the game but I suppose that's what happens with
> a brand new chip generation coming out.
>
> A few regression fixes,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> I'll have you know that I haven't quite even left for Au yet, and I
>> have LCA before diving. So no snarky "in between dives" comments,
>> please.
>
> It wasn't meant to be
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <
b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> It wasn't meant to be "snarky", sorry about that...
I'm kidding, I'm kidding, you can be as snarky as you want. It's not like
I'm some fragile flower.
> My usual problem with git request-pull when the m
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 16:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'll have you know that I haven't quite even left for Au yet, and I
> have LCA before diving. So no snarky "in between dives" comments,
> please.
It wasn't meant to be "snarky", sorry about that...
> At least not for a few days.
>
> >
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Whenever you have a chance between two dives, you might want to consider
> pulling my merge branch to pickup a few fixes for 3.8 that have been
> accumulating for the last couple of weeks (I was myself travelling
> then on vacation
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 17:13 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here are a couple of small powerpc fixes. They aren't new bugs (and
> they are both CCed to stable) but I didn't see the point of sitting
> on the fixes any longer.
Looks like I still need to fix my script to get th
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:07 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here's a patch that would be good to still have in 3.7. It's a one liner
> fixing
> a regression introduced by the new EEH code in .37 (potential oops on some
> PCI setups when configuring MSIs).
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:08 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:07 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Hi Linus !
> >
> > Here's a patch that would be good to still have in 3.7. It's a one liner
> > fixing
> > a regression introduced by the new EEH code in .37 (po
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 09:02 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. There's nothing there.
>
> Did you mean for me to pull some branch/tag you didn't mention?
Heh, yeah, the mirrors hadn't updated yet so git request-pull didn't put
the branch name in. It's common but I usually fix it up by hand. Sinc
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this happens if you have "reverse merges" (ie you've pulled my
> tree, or some other tree I've pulled), and there is no longer a single
> clear common point that you started from. In that case, there is no
> simple diff for the "what has
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> The following changes since commit 271fd03a3013b106ccc178d54219c1be0c9759b7:
>
> powerpc/powernv: I/O and memory alignment for P2P bridges (2012-09-11
> 16:59:47 -0600)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> First, however, a note about the pull request details ... the diffstat looks
> completely on crack, any idea what's up ? It sees piles of files modified
> in various other archs & generic code but I see no patch in that branch
> tha
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 16:12 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The following changes since commit
> 5b716ac728bcc01b1f2a7ed6e437196602237c27:
>
> Merge branch 'for-next' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6
> (2012-09-02 11:30:10 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
>
[ Added defconfig updates from Kim to fix NFS boot on yocto ]
The following changes since commit 0d7614f09c1ebdbaa1599a5aba7593f147bf96ee:
Linux 3.6-rc1 (2012-08-02 16:38:10 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git merge
Ben,
Added a watchdog fix.
- k
The following changes since commit 0d7614f09c1ebdbaa1599a5aba7593f147bf96ee:
Linux 3.6-rc1 (2012-08-02 16:38:10 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git merge
for you to fetch changes up
Ben,
Poke. :)
- k
On Aug 10, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Two updates from last week (one dts bug fix, one minor defconfig update)
>
> - k
>
> The following changes since commit 0d7614f09c1ebdbaa1599a5aba7593f147bf96ee:
>
> Linux 3.6-rc1 (2012-08-02 16:38:10 -0700)
>
>
Ben,
Two updates from last week (one dts bug fix, one minor defconfig update)
- k
The following changes since commit 0d7614f09c1ebdbaa1599a5aba7593f147bf96ee:
Linux 3.6-rc1 (2012-08-02 16:38:10 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ga
On Aug 3, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 08:39 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> Weekly bug fix pull request.
>
> Well, Linus is on holiday so I don't think it makes sense for me to ask
> him to pull anything just yet... I'll put it in my tree some
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 08:39 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Weekly bug fix pull request.
Well, Linus is on holiday so I don't think it makes sense for me to ask
him to pull anything just yet... I'll put it in my tree some time next
week and will send it along with whatever I have as well when
--- On Mon, 7/2/12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Subject: Re: [git pull] Please pull powerpc.git merge branch
> To: "Gerhard Pircher"
> Cc: "linuxppc-dev list"
> Date: Monday, July 2, 2012, 3:20 PM
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 a
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 23:38 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
>
> What about this fix:?
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/166346/
>
> At least I can't see it in the log...
The module fix went in. The ftrace patch, well, it's untested and we
don't even know if we have a problem with mcount yet,
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:57:39 +1000
> Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> An: Linus Torvalds
> CC: linuxppc-dev list , Andrew Morton
> , Linux Kernel list
> Betreff: [git pull] Please pull powerpc.git merge branch
> Hi Linus
>
> Here are two more fixes th
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 20:50 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > Here are a few powerpc fixes. Arguably some of this should have come to
> > you earlier but I'm only just catching up after my medical leave.
> >
> > Mostly these fixes regressions, a couple are long standing bugs.
>
> Benh,
>
> This
> Here are a few powerpc fixes. Arguably some of this should have come to
> you earlier but I'm only just catching up after my medical leave.
>
> Mostly these fixes regressions, a couple are long standing bugs.
Benh,
This should probably go up now too:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/167270
Ben,
Dropped the P1020RDB device tree patch as it was for the wrong board
revision and pulled in some additional usb device tree fixes.
- k
The following changes since commit c2bc3a316a7281f67e36b34dac2802cbe36a9128:
Merge branch 'x86/rdrand' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 13:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> This doesnt appear to have the compile fix for p1022_ds.c.
I must have pulled it into the wrong branch or something... I'll do a
new one after LCA.
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linux
On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Please pull this couple of important bug fixes (a commit
> that went in breaks booting on some machines, this fixes
> it properly).
>
> Thanks !
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> The following changes since commit 7b3480f8b7011
Ben,
Pulled in a bunch of other minor fixes that have been sitting around for a
while.
- k
The following changes since commit caca6a03d365883564885f2c1da3e88dcf65d139:
Linux 3.2-rc3 (2011-11-23 20:20:28 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kerne
On Nov 23, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> A few minor fixes for FSL PPC SoCs to send up to Linus.
>
> - k
>
> The following changes since commit caca6a03d365883564885f2c1da3e88dcf65d139:
>
> Linux 3.2-rc3 (2011-11-23 20:20:28 -0800)
>
> are available in the git repository a
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 15:21 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Me again :-) So yesterday you pulled my -next branch with the bulk of
> what happened since the last merge window up to when I left for my long
> vacation (5 weeks). Today are a few remaining nits that happened durin
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are a few fixes for powerpc. Mostly innocuous stuff, in fact most of
> > it has been in my tree for a while, I just hadn't got a chance to actually
> > send it a
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Here are a few fixes for powerpc. Mostly innocuous stuff, in fact most of
> it has been in my tree for a while, I just hadn't got a chance to actually
> send it as I was travelling.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> The following changes sinc
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Shaohui Xie (2):
> powerpc/fsl_rio: move machine_check handler
This patch causes a build failure if CONFIG_FSL_RIO is not defined:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `machine_check_e500mc':
/home/b04825/git/linux.hv/arch/powerpc
On May 27, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here's the 3 patches Kumar was complaining I forgot to pull :-)
>
> Two are pretty old patches related to FSL RapidIO stuff, and
> one is a bug fix.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Thanks. I know I'm a pain ;)
- k
__
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:02 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Did you ignore my pull request with a bug fix and two long standing
> RIO patches?
I suppose I did ... oops :-)
I'll send that today.
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc
On May 26, 2011, at 12:22 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> This is a bit more than I expected to send you that late in the merge
> window, but hopefully none of it should be problematic. A couple of
> patches were simply delayed due to misunderstandings as to which tree
> they
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:23 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 02:06:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git merge
>
> When I try to build 'next' (now at 208
On May 20, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:32:59PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:58:45AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:23:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
When I try to build 'next' (now at 208b3a4c),
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 04:32:59PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:58:45AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:23:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> >When I try to build 'next' (now at 208b3a4c), it does not compile due
>> >to a change from the follow
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:58:45AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:23:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> >When I try to build 'next' (now at 208b3a4c), it does not compile due
> >to a change from the following commit.
> >
> >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt (1):
> >> powerpc/s
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:23:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
>When I try to build 'next' (now at 208b3a4c), it does not compile due
>to a change from the following commit.
>
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt (1):
>> powerpc/smp: Make start_secondary_resume available to all CPU variants
>
>I would
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 02:06:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git merge
When I try to build 'next' (now at 208b3a4c), it does not compile due
to a change from the following commit.
On May 18, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus
>
> Dunno if it's too late or not yet but here's 3 fixes for powerpc that
> would be welcome to have in before the release. If not I'll send them
> first thing next (one of them is already in -next in fact).
>
> Those are re
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > Dunno if it's too late or not yet but here's 3 fixes for powerpc that
> > would be welcome to have in before the release. If not I'll send them
> > first thing next (
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:11:47 -0700
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
>>
>> Dunno if it's too late or not yet but here's 3 fixes for powerpc that
>> would be welcome to have in before the release. If not I'll send them
>> first thing next (
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Dunno if it's too late or not yet but here's 3 fixes for powerpc that
> would be welcome to have in before the release. If not I'll send them
> first thing next (one of them is already in -next in fact).
Gah. I just cut 2.6.39.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:44:18 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I vote for:
> > >
> > > -> Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at f7937794
> >
> > Or
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael Ellerman
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:02 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman
>> > > > > au> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I vote for:
>> >
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:02 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman > au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I vote for:
> > > >=20
> > > > -> Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at f7937794
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman au> wrote:
> > >
> > > I vote for:
> > >=20
> > > -> Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at f7937794
> >=20
> > Or:
> >=20
> > =E2=98=9B Exception: 401 (Instruction Access)
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
> >
> > I vote for:
> >
> > -> Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at f7937794
>
> Or:
>
> ☛ Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at f7937794
Let's get ser
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 08:42 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > Michael Neuling (1):
> > powerpc: Fix call to subpage_protection()
>
> Well that's annoying...
>
> Looks like the bottom of my commit got chopped as the oops message has a
> "---" in it. We lost the cc: sta...@kernel.org :-(
>
> Michael Neuling (1):
> powerpc: Fix call to subpage_protection()
Well that's annoying...
Looks like the bottom of my commit got chopped as the oops message has a
"---" in it. We lost the cc: sta...@kernel.org :-(
Comparing the original post to the final commit:
http://lists.ozlabs.or
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> This isn't critical, but it does fix having the ppc64e_defconfig
> build cleanly.
Doesn't matter, I'm putting it in -next. When is your -next branch btw ?
It's overdue by 3 or 4 rc's already :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> - k
>
> The followin
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:04 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> This isn't critical, but it does fix having the ppc64e_defconfig
> build cleanly.
BTW. Do you have a -next for me ? It's past time :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> - k
>
> The following changes since commit 6b0cd00bc396daf5c2dcf17a8d82055335341
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 15:56 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here's a few small fixes, one is an important fix for a nasty regression
> breaking pseries machine running under hypervisor... oops !
I updated this with some embedded fixed from Kumar and a fix for a new
deadlock
On May 13, 2010, at 11:28 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The following changes since commit 131c6c9eddfa252e376edb4aeff9c7fe1b96a798:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt (1):
>Merge commit 'kumar/merge' into merge
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 05:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Did where you going to also send linus:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/51496/
Forgot about that one... I'll add it to the pile tomorrow.
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxpp
On May 12, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Please pull this perf event fix from Paulus. Without it, using perf event
> can potentially oops the machine at any time.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> The following changes since commit cea0d767c29669bf89f86e4a
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:56 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> PowerPC has been a bit quiet this time around :-) That is until Kumar
> woke me up with a few fixes and defconfig updates for the freescale
> embedded platforms.
I added a few patches to that. Some ps3 defconfig & m
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:48 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Benjamin,
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Hi Linus !
> >
> > PowerPC has been a bit quiet this time around :-) That is until Kumar
> > woke me up with a few fixes and defconfig updates for the freescale
> > embedded platforms.
Hello Benjamin,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> PowerPC has been a bit quiet this time around :-) That is until Kumar
> woke me up with a few fixes and defconfig updates for the freescale
> embedded platforms.
I got no comments for the following patch:
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pip
On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:09 PM, Felix Radensky wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> On 4/27/2010 2:05 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> I've updated this to include this one additional patch for dealing with
>> CONFIG_RELOCATE on FSL-BookE ppc32
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/51011/
>>
>>
>
>
Hi Kumar,
On 4/27/2010 2:05 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Ben,
I've updated this to include this one additional patch for dealing with
CONFIG_RELOCATE on FSL-BookE ppc32
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/51011/
Can this patch also be included: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50289/
Thanks.
Ben,
I've updated this to include this one additional patch for dealing with
CONFIG_RELOCATE on FSL-BookE ppc32
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/51011/
- k
On Apr 19, 2010, at 11:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> (Mostly defconfig updates, but a few minor bug fixes).
>
> The following changes sinc
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 21:26 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 21:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> Ben,
> >>
> >> These are two minor fixes that should go into 2.6.33.
> >
> > It's a bit late for such fixes, but it's
On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 21:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> These are two minor fixes that should go into 2.6.33.
>
> It's a bit late for such fixes, but it's your platforms and your call
> here so I'll pull and push out to Lin
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 21:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ben,
>
> These are two minor fixes that should go into 2.6.33.
It's a bit late for such fixes, but it's your platforms and your call
here so I'll pull and push out to Linus.
Cheers,
Ben.
> - k
>
> The following changes since commit 724e6d3
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 10:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here are some more defconfig updates that I missed before LCA and a
> few PCI related fixes, some of them actually fixing regressions and
> one of them (the 4xx one) trivial enough that's really not worth
> delaying
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 07:32 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> You missed my defconfig updates. I sent you a pull request 2 weeks
> ago.
>
> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-January/079309.html
>
> Those are still sitting in that tree on that branch if someone wanted
> to pull
> them
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:45:48PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>Hi Linus !
>
>A tad late due to me slacking and leaving the patches take dust in
>patchwork for a bit too long, but here are a few bug fixes for powerpc
>and a bunch of defconfig freshen ups for some of our embedded platforms.
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:14 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Kumar Gala (7):
> > powerpc: Add a Book-3E 64-bit defconfig
> > powerpc: Fix compile errors found by new ppc64e_defconfig
> > powerpc: Limit hugetlbfs support
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:14 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Kumar Gala (7):
> > powerpc: Add a Book-3E 64-bit defconfig
> > powerpc: Fix compile errors found by new ppc64e_defconfig
> > powerpc: Limit hugetlbfs support
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Kumar Gala (7):
> powerpc: Add a Book-3E 64-bit defconfig
> powerpc: Fix compile errors found by new ppc64e_defconfig
> powerpc: Limit hugetlbfs support to PPC64 Book-3S machines
This is incredibly ugly. Why should the gen
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:11 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Some of these might have been better in -rc4 or earlier, all my fault
> for having some backlog that I'm still going through. So we have some
> bug fixes (not necessarily regressions but also generally simple
> enoug
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:05 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:33:48PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >Hi Linus !
> >
> >Here are a couple of last minute patches for 2.6.31. One is a regression fix
> >(afaik) where a PS3 driver gets incorrectly loaded on other platforms a
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:33:48PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>Hi Linus !
>
>Here are a couple of last minute patches for 2.6.31. One is a regression fix
>(afaik) where a PS3 driver gets incorrectly loaded on other platforms and
>crashes, along with a PS3 defconfig update.
>The following
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 12:09 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here's the first half of the powerpc merge for 2.6.31. I'll have the
> rest in a couple of days, just dealing with some of my own backlog here
> plus some collisions.
.../...
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux
Hey Ben,
Can you please also pull in my merge branch?
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-May/071626.html
Thanks,
g.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> Hi Linus !
>
> Here are a few things still for .30 for you to merge !
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> The follo
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Are you aware the old one was introduced in 2.6.29-rc1? So there cannot be a
> regression from 2.6.28 or older.
Ahh, no, that part hadn't registered.
In that case, I guess I don't really care, as long as everybody involved
feels it's clearly
Hi Linus,
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I'd like to have Andrew or Linus opinion on doing this driver swap that
> > late in the process.
>
> Quite franklly, no.
>
> If it was a totally _new_ driver, there's no chance
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> I'd like to have Andrew or Linus opinion on doing this driver swap that
> late in the process.
Quite franklly, no.
If it was a totally _new_ driver, there's no chance of regression, which
is why we allow those drivers.
But switching an
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 10:37 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Here are some late fixes for 2.6.29. I've included a radeonfb/aty128fb
> > commit
>
> Will you also take care of the new ps3vram driver, which has been ack'ed by
> Jens for 2.6.29
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Here are some late fixes for 2.6.29. I've included a radeonfb/aty128fb commit
Will you also take care of the new ps3vram driver, which has been ack'ed by
Jens for 2.6.29?
Or do you prefer it to go in by email through Geoff (as PS3 maintainer), o
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:46 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It's a regression from 2.6.28, yes. See:
>
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-February/067914.html
>
> and
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/21527/
>
> (note the Accepted state)
>
> >if it's in my next or test branch ? I
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 07:30:21AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 06:28 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 03:07:24PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> >Hi Linus !
>> >
>> >Please pull a few regression fixes for powerpc.
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Ben.
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
