On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:02 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:31 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mich...@ellerman.id.= > > au> wrote: > > > > > > > > I vote for: > > > >=20 > > > > -> Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at 00000000f7937794 > > >=20 > > > Or: > > >=20 > > > =E2=98=9B Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at 00000000f7937794 > > > > Let's get serious, it's _really_ like a phone call: > > > > =E2=98=8E Exception: 401 (Instruction Access) at 00000000f7937794 > > We need a dedicated NACK char!
␕!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
