On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:35:31PM +0100, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:59:41 +0100
> > Von: Gabriel Paubert
> > An: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > CC: Gerhard Pircher , linuxppc-dev list
> >
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:59:41 +0100
> Von: Gabriel Paubert
> An: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> CC: Gerhard Pircher , linuxppc-dev list
>
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Add platform support for AmigaOne
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:50
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:50:07PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > + hose->first_busno = bus_range ? bus_range[0] : 0;
> > + hose->last_busno = bus_range ? bus_range[1] : 0xff;
> > +
> > + setup_indirect_pci(hose, 0xfec00cf8, 0xfee00cfc, 0);
>
> Minor in the context of amigaone but sti
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 13:09 +0100, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> I agree that these addresses should come from the device-tree, but these
> two config registers are not located within the normal PCI I/O address
> space (0xfe00-0xfec0).
> Maybe I should add a "reg" property to the PHB node, but I
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:50:07 +1100
> Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> An: Gerhard Pircher
> CC: linuxppc-dev list
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Add platform support for AmigaOne
> > + hose->first_busno = bus_range ? bus_
> + hose->first_busno = bus_range ? bus_range[0] : 0;
> + hose->last_busno = bus_range ? bus_range[1] : 0xff;
> +
> + setup_indirect_pci(hose, 0xfec00cf8, 0xfee00cfc, 0);
Minor in the context of amigaone but still... the above should come from
the device-tree... I suppose those are really just IO
