On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:06 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:51 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
>> > > ping? I'd love if this could go in for 4.3
>> >
>> > It's way too la
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:06 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:51 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> > > ping? I'd love if this could go in for 4.3
> >
> > It's way too late for 4.3.
> >
> > -Scott
>
> Argh. I was hoping that,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:51 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
>> ping? I'd love if this could go in for 4.3
>
> It's way too late for 4.3.
>
> -Scott
Argh. I was hoping that, as it's a one-line change to existing code it
might be able to sneak in.
An
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:51 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> ping? I'd love if this could go in for 4.3
It's way too late for 4.3.
-Scott
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
> > This board uses a P5020 chip, and boots just fine using
> > the corenet_generic code. The device tre
ping? I'd love if this could go in for 4.3
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
> This board uses a P5020 chip, and boots just fine using
> the corenet_generic code. The device tree is very similar to the
> P5020DS, except that there is no Flash memory. The environment is,
> instea
