On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:06 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:51 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote: >> > > ping? I'd love if this could go in for 4.3 >> > >> > It's way too late for 4.3. >> > >> > -Scott >> >> Argh. I was hoping that, as it's a one-line change to existing code it >> might be able to sneak in. > > It's hard to call it "sneaking in" when a new pull request chain has to be > created just for one patch. :-P > > Non-bugfixes need to be in my pull request to Michael before the merge window > opens (and thus submitted long enough before that for me to have a chance to > do a review/apply/build-test session), not a couple days before the merge > window closes. Why does it matter if this is in 4.3 versus 4.4? > > -Scott >
I definitely understand. To be fair, I submitted the patch 3 days after the window opened (not a couple before it closes), but that is still after the deadline. The only issue with it going into 4.4 is that the support isn't in mainline till 4.3 is tagged. It just creates a bigger lag between the hardware availability and upstream software availability. Bad timing on our part, I was just hoping. :) Andy _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
