On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 22:36 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> Depends on interpretation. IIRC currently the same die is used for 440EPx
> >> and
> >> 440GRx. I could be wrong here though and it is just a bug in the chip. But
> >> anyway we should support this
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> Depends on interpretation. IIRC currently the same die is used for 440EPx
>> and
>> 440GRx. I could be wrong here though and it is just a bug in the chip. But
>> anyway we should support this somehow. Could be that I missed this in the
>> current 440GRx (Rainier
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 03:39:23 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:05:42 +1000
> > David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:17AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > +
> Depends on interpretation. IIRC currently the same die is used for 440EPx and
> 440GRx. I could be wrong here though and it is just a bug in the chip. But
> anyway we should support this somehow. Could be that I missed this in the
> current 440GRx (Rainier) arch/ppc support too. I have to adm
On Friday 03 August 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >> Should the 440GRX PVR additions be done in a separate patch? Or is the
> >> PVR and cpu features truly the only difference between 440EPx and
> >> 440GRx?
> >
> > I think it makes sense to add the 440GRx with this patchset too. The
> > 440GRx
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 02 August 2007, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:16:28 +0400
>>> +0400 +++ linux/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c 2007-07-27
>>> 20:44:26.0 +0400 @@ -1132,6 +1132,42 @@
>>> .dcache_bsize = 32,
>>> .platform
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:16:28 +0400
> Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> diff -ruN linux.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
>> linux/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
>> --- linux.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c2007-07-27
>> 20:37:10.0 +0400
>>
On Aug 2, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:05:42 +1000
> David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:17AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> + { /* 440EPX - without Security/Kasumi */
> + .pvr_mask = 0xf
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:16:28 +0400
> > +0400 +++ linux/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c 2007-07-27
> > 20:44:26.0 +0400 @@ -1132,6 +1132,42 @@
> > .dcache_bsize = 32,
> > .platform = "ppc440",
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:16:28 +0400
Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff -ruN linux.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> linux/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
> --- linux.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c 2007-07-27 20:37:10.0
> +0400
> +++ linux/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputa
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:05:42 +1000
David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:17AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >> +{ /* 440EPX - without Security/Kasumi */
> > >> +.pvr_mask = 0xffff,
> > >> +.pvr_valu
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:17AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> + { /* 440EPX - without Security/Kasumi */
> >> + .pvr_mask = 0xffff,
> >> + .pvr_value = 0x28D4,
> >> + .cpu_name = "440EPX - no Security/Kasumi",
>> +{ /* 440EPX - without Security/Kasumi */
>> +.pvr_mask = 0xffff,
>> +.pvr_value = 0x28D4,
>> +.cpu_name = "440EPX - no Security/Kasumi",
>> +.cpu_features = CPU_FTRS_44X,
>> +
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 07:16:28PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> AMCC 440EPx Sequoia board support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c | 36 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/head_44x.S |2 -
> arch/powerpc
14 matches
Mail list logo
