Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()

2014-01-27 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 03:51:02PM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing > > > arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_e

Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()

2014-01-27 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing > arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable(). > > We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and > this is done a second time in arch_c

Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()

2014-01-27 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing > > arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable(). > > > > We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_

Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()

2014-01-27 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable(). We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that