On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
> > arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
> >
> > We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
> > this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
> > enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
> >
> > So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
> > CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
> > at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
> > given that FIQs are not currently used on ARM64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org>
>
> For arm64, we could simply remove any reference to FIQs. I'm not aware
> of anyone using them.
OK. What if I sumply remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare() and let you do the
remove the rest?
IMHO I'd simply remove local_fiq_{enable/disable}() from
arm64/kernel/smp.c and leave the infrastructure in place in case someone
needs it eventually. In which case I could include that into my patch
as well.
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
