On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:12 +1000, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-08-19 14:49:30 +1000:
> > Do we really need the accessors? They don't buy anything I can see over just
> > using ctx->priv directly.
>
> The reasoning there is because we don't currently expose
Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-08-19 14:49:30 +1000:
> Do we really need the accessors? They don't buy anything I can see over just
> using ctx->priv directly.
The reasoning there is because we don't currently expose the contents of
stuct cxl_context to afu drivers, rather they j
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 14:19 +1000, Ian Munsie wrote:
> From: Michael Neuling
>
> This provides AFU drivers a means to associate private data with a cxl
> context. This is particularly intended for make the new callbacks for
> driver specific events easier for AFU drivers to use, as they can easil