Excerpts from Frederic Barrat's message of 2016-06-30 17:50:00 +0200:
>
> Le 30/06/2016 17:32, Ian Munsie a écrit :
> >> For dedicated mode, the CAIA recommends an explicit reset of the AFU
> >> >(section 2.1.1).
> > True, I had forgotten that procedure was added to the document before it
> > was
Le 30/06/2016 17:32, Ian Munsie a écrit :
For dedicated mode, the CAIA recommends an explicit reset of the AFU
>(section 2.1.1).
True, I had forgotten that procedure was added to the document before it
was made public - I'll update the comment and resend.
Actually, my point was that for ded
Excerpts from Frederic Barrat's message of 2016-06-30 16:19:54 +0200:
> I'm not a big fan of the new "clear" argument, which forces us to pass
> an extra 0 most of the time. Why not always clearing the "action" bits
> of the register before applying the command? They are mutually
> exclusive, so
Hi Ian,
-static int afu_control(struct cxl_afu *afu, u64 command,
+static int afu_control(struct cxl_afu *afu, u64 command, u64 clear,
u64 result, u64 mask, bool enabled)
I'm not a big fan of the new "clear" argument, which forces us to pass
an extra 0 most of the time.
