Excerpts from Frederic Barrat's message of 2016-06-30 17:50:00 +0200: > > Le 30/06/2016 17:32, Ian Munsie a écrit : > >> For dedicated mode, the CAIA recommends an explicit reset of the AFU > >> >(section 2.1.1). > > True, I had forgotten that procedure was added to the document before it > > was made public - I'll update the comment and resend. > > > > Actually, my point was that for dedicated mode, we shouldn't have the > "if" and always reset. It's only for dedicated mode, so it wouldn't > impact cx4 and we would stay CAIA-compliant. If one day, there's a xsl > with a dedicated mode AFU, they are expected to follow the spec.
Yeah, I thought of that as well while I was updating the patch and removed that from the dedicated path. I still added a comment to that path to note that though. Cheers, -Ian _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
