Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Grant Likely
Likely > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:36 PM > > > To: Stephen Neuendorffer > > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Wolfgang Reissnegger; Leonid; > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices > > > &

Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Grant Likely
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Wolfgang Reissnegger; Leonid; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices > > > > On 10/16/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Grant Likely
On 10/16/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It occurs to me that the 'compatible' bindings should probably be the > name of the preferred driver for the device. > > > + l) Xilinx ML300 Framebuffer > > +- compatible : Must include "xilinx,ml300-fb" > Should probably be 'xi

RE: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > It occurs to me that the 'compatible' bindings should probably be the > name of the preferred driver for the device. > > > + l) Xilinx ML300 Framebuffer > > +- compatible : Must include "xilinx,ml300-fb" > Should probably be '

RE: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
t: Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices > > On 10/16/07, Stephen Neuendorffer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > + n) Xilinx EMAC and Xilinx TEMAC > > > + > > > + Xilinx Ethernet devices. Uses common properties fr

RE: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
It occurs to me that the 'compatible' bindings should probably be the name of the preferred driver for the device. > + l) Xilinx ML300 Framebuffer > +- compatible : Must include "xilinx,ml300-fb" Should probably be 'xilinxfb', and probably shouldn't reference ML300 at all. > + n) Xilinx

Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Grant Likely
On 10/16/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + n) Xilinx EMAC and Xilinx TEMAC > > + > > + Xilinx Ethernet devices. Uses common properties from > > other Ethernet > > + devices with the following constraints: > > + > > + Required properties: > > +- compatible : Mu

RE: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-16 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
> + n) Xilinx EMAC and Xilinx TEMAC > + > + Xilinx Ethernet devices. Uses common properties from > other Ethernet > + devices with the following constraints: > + > + Required properties: > +- compatible : Must include one of: "xilinx,plb-temac", > + "xilinx,plb-e

Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-15 Thread Grant Likely
On 10/15/07, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 15 October 2007, Grant Likely wrote: > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Here's my second version of xilinx device tree bindings. Please review > > and comment. I'd like to push these out to Paulus in the next couple

Re: [PATCH v2] Device tree bindings for Xilinx devices

2007-10-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 15 October 2007, Grant Likely wrote: > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Here's my second version of xilinx device tree bindings. Please review > and comment. I'd like to push these out to Paulus in the next couple > of days. There are a few more properties that I can imagine