On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > It occurs to me that the 'compatible' bindings should probably be the > name of the preferred driver for the device. > > > + l) Xilinx ML300 Framebuffer > > + - compatible : Must include "xilinx,ml300-fb" > Should probably be 'xilinxfb', and probably shouldn't reference ML300 at > all. > > > + n) Xilinx EMAC and Xilinx TEMAC > > + > > + Xilinx Ethernet devices. Uses common properties from > > other Ethernet > > + devices with the following constraints: > > + > > + Required properties: > > + - compatible : Must include one of: "xilinx,plb-temac", > > + "xilinx,plb-emac", "xilinx-opb-emac" > Should probably be just 'emac' and 'temac'.
You mean xilinx,emac and xilinx,temac, right? emac and temac are too generic by themselves. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
