Sorry, guess I missed it...
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Grant Likely
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:25 PM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: John Linn; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POW
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant,
>
> If you have working platform code using libfdt, can you publish it?
Yes,
I've actually already published it once. I'll post v2 this afternoon.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technolog
ppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: Boot: Fix 16550 UART
initialization
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > That makes sense. Since I'm not using a boot loader I didn't
realize
> > that.
> >
&
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, I'll do that.
>
> Does this also apply to my other patch, Adding 8250 console support to
> OF serial, as it's not clear to me when to assume the UART is already
> setup or not?
I haven't reviewed that one yet. I'll
ant Likely
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 2:08 PM
To: John Linn
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: Boot: Fix 16550 UART
initialization
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That makes sense. Since I'm n
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That makes sense. Since I'm not using a boot loader I didn't realize
> that.
>
> I'm not sure how hard it will be to get the data from the device tree at
> that time.
You should be good. It is now possible to read data fr
labs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: Boot: Fix 16550 UART
initialization
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The UART 16550 initialization was not setting up the registers
> correctly. Code was added to pull the
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The UART 16550 initialization was not setting up the registers
> correctly. Code was added to pull the frequency and speed from
> the device tree and initialize the registers using those values.
>
> The boot code was not an
