On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 20:15 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 10:31 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Michael Ellerman
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 02:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool w
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 10:31 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 02:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Eller
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 10:31 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 02:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> > > It's also worth noting that the __flush_po
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 02:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > > It's also worth noting that the __flush_power7 uses tlbiel instead of
>> > > tlbie.
>> >
>> > Yeah tha
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 02:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > It's also worth noting that the __flush_power7 uses tlbiel instead of
> > > tlbie.
> >
> > Yeah that's a good point. It's not clear if the swsusp code wants to a
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > It's also worth noting that the __flush_power7 uses tlbiel instead of tlbie.
>
> Yeah that's a good point. It's not clear if the swsusp code wants to a local
> or
> a global invalidate.
If I read the code right, this is called
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 11:25 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 08:35 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 08:43 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We received a report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267395)
> >> of bad assembly
> >> when compiling
On 10/05/2015 08:35 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 08:43 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
We received a report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267395) of
bad assembly
when compiling on powerpc with little endian
...
After some discussion with the binutils fol
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 08:43 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We received a report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267395) of
> bad assembly
> when compiling on powerpc with little endian
...
> After some discussion with the binutils folks, it turns out that the tlbie
> instruc
On 10/03/2015 05:00 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:24:46PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
Ok, than we can just zero out r5 for example and use it in tlbie as RS,
right?
That won't assemble _unless_ your assembler is in POWER7 mode. It also
won't do the right thing at ru
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:24:46PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > > Ok, than we can just zero out r5 for example and use it in tlbie as RS,
> > > right?
> >
> > That won't assemble _unless_ your assembler is in POWER7 mode. It also
> > won't do the right thing at run time on older machines.
>
>
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 17:00 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:37:35AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> > >> -0: tlbie r4; \
> > >> +0: tlbie r4, 0; \
> > >
> > > This isn't correct. With POWER7 and later (wh
On 10/02/2015 03:00 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:37:35AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
-0: tlbie r4; \
+0: tlbie r4, 0; \
This isn't correct. With POWER7 and later (which this compile
is, since it's on
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:37:35AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> >> -0: tlbie r4; \
> >> +0: tlbie r4, 0; \
> >
> > This isn't correct. With POWER7 and later (which this compile
> > is, since it's on LE), the tlbie instruction takes
On 10/2/15, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:03 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/swsusp_asm64.S: Assembler messages:
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/swsusp_asm64.S:188: Error: missing operand
>>> scripts/Makefile.build:294: recipe for target
>>> 'arch/powerpc/kernel/swsus
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:03 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/swsusp_asm64.S: Assembler messages:
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/swsusp_asm64.S:188: Error: missing operand
>> scripts/Makefile.build:294: recipe for target
>> 'arch/powerpc/kernel/swsusp_asm64.o' failed
>> make[1]: *** [arch/
On 10/2/15, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We received a report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267395)
> of bad assembly
> when compiling on powerpc with little endian
>
> [labbott@labbott-redhat-machine linux_upstream]$ make ARCH=powerpc
> CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-gnu-
>CHK
Hi,
We received a report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267395) of
bad assembly
when compiling on powerpc with little endian
[labbott@labbott-redhat-machine linux_upstream]$ make ARCH=powerpc
CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-gnu-
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK in
18 matches
Mail list logo
