On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> This patch improves OF GPIO bindings so, that most non-OF-specific gpio
>> controllers don't need to call any of OF binding function:
>>
>> 0) Move of_gpio_chip into main gp
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> This patch improves OF GPIO bindings so, that most non-OF-specific gpio
> controllers don't need to call any of OF binding function:
>
> 0) Move of_gpio_chip into main gpio_chip structure.
> 1) Call of_gpio_init/destroy from gpiochi
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:08:21PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > And it turned out that the only sane solution is to write
> > OF-pdata-hooks for the each driver (that we do for many drivers
> > already):
>
> Or to support Grant in getting rid of of_platform :)
No, of_platform is completely othe
> And it turned out that the only sane solution is to write
> OF-pdata-hooks for the each driver (that we do for many drivers
> already):
Or to support Grant in getting rid of of_platform :)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industrial Linux Solutions
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:42:22PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> This patch improves OF GPIO bindings so, that most non-OF-specific gpio
> controllers don't need to call any of OF binding function:
>
> 0) Move of_gpio_chip into main gpio_chip structure.
> 1) Call of_gpio_init/destroy fro
This patch improves OF GPIO bindings so, that most non-OF-specific gpio
controllers don't need to call any of OF binding function:
0) Move of_gpio_chip into main gpio_chip structure.
1) Call of_gpio_init/destroy from gpiochip_add/remove.
2) By default supply reasonable defaults for gpio_cells/xlat
