Hi Dave,
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:44:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:24:02 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net/ibmveth: fix panic in probe
>
> netdev->dev_addr changed from being an array to being a pointer, so we
> should not take its address for
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Dave,
This fixes it (I wonder if this bug is lurking in any other drivers):
Yes, there are some other exists. This spatch script can help to found this.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
# cat netdev_dev_addr.cocci
@@
struct net_device *dev;
@@
memcpy(
- &de
Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:44:51AM CEST, s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>This fixes it (I wonder if this bug is lurking in any other drivers):
Grepping the sources I see some other places suffering this problem. I'll send
patch for this.
>
>From: Stephen Rothwell
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:
Hi Dave,
This fixes it (I wonder if this bug is lurking in any other drivers):
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:24:02 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] net/ibmveth: fix panic in probe
netdev->dev_addr changed from being an array to being a pointer, so we
should not take its address for mem
Hi all,
On Mon, 11 May 2009 22:37:09 +0530 Sachin Sant wrote:
>
> Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:57:22PM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
> >
> >> From: Sachin Sant
> >> Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:22:48 +0530
> >>
> >>
> >>> Todays Next failed to boot on a Power6 JS22 blade
Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:57:22PM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Sachin Sant
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:22:48 +0530
Todays Next failed to boot on a Power6 JS22 blade with following oops.
Jiri, I suspect this might be your address list changes.
Although
